26 Comments
User's avatar
Inverted Pyramid's avatar

Julie: if an army crossed our borders illegally, does that army get to receive “due process”?

Expand full comment
Robert Yates's avatar

If they can get before the Roberts Court -- Probably.

Expand full comment
Cara Wakefield's avatar

Interesting question!

Expand full comment
Anthony Latimore Jr's avatar

They do not.

Expand full comment
Cara Wakefield's avatar

I know that. It's interesting because no one has posed that question before, and interesting because some brain dead judge would rule they are.

Expand full comment
Robert Yates's avatar

Kind of like John Roberts?

Expand full comment
Cara Wakefield's avatar

Unless another brain dead judge beats him to it.

Expand full comment
Anthony Latimore Jr's avatar

Dont be foolish. They do not

Expand full comment
Inverted Pyramid's avatar

… then what is the difference?

Expand full comment
Anthony Latimore Jr's avatar

Between an invading army vs illegal immigration?

Expand full comment
Inverted Pyramid's avatar

Excellent attempt at reframing!

What is the difference between an illegal army invading the country and an illegal person/people invading the country?

Expand full comment
P Mac's avatar

Looks like SCOTUS is engaged in the exercise of slow walking. I do NOT trust the motives of The Court

Expand full comment
HR's avatar

The Supreme Court majority is complicit in the use of the courts to slow down, halt, or outright stop President Trump's agenda. He was very clear in his campaign as to what he would do as President and he was elected. For judges, led by Chief Justice Roberts, to overstep their Article III Powers is leading us to a Constitutional crisis.

Expand full comment
Rev. Karlan Fairchild, MDiv's avatar

A good synopsis of the confusion and the ridiculous opinion of the squishy Chief Justice of the Supreme Court, Julie. I'm pretty certain that you have read my comments pertaining to that human road block to President Trump's agenda. Also, I have written extensively (at least it seems like) that the true "Constitutional Crisis" in which we are living has nothing to do with any actions taken by President Trump as he attempts to navigate these preposterous decisions rendered by Marxists-Wearing-Black-Robes in the lower tier of the federal judiciary. To the contrary, this "Constitutional Crisis" rests solely on these Marxists-Wearing-Black-Robes in the lower tier of the federal judiciary who appear to believe that they have total control over the President's Article II authority pertaining to executing foreign policy. At the risk of being redundant, the only way this problem will be solved will require President Trump to openly and dramatically defy these execrable decisions. One can only be hopeful and prayerful that it will come to pass...

Expand full comment
Robert Yates's avatar

This isn't a "Constitutional Crisis". It's a judicial coup.

Expand full comment
Carolyn's avatar

Start arresting these judges for insurrection and treason. That is what they are doing. An ordinary citizen would have already been behind bars. Judges are not above the laws.

Expand full comment
Tom S.'s avatar

Or just ignore them

Expand full comment
K3's avatar

Promote that guy!

This should be the first response to any deportation suit: “… the Court may not entertain [ ] various challenges to the findings contained in the Proclamation or to the President’s exercise of his AEA authority.”

Expand full comment
alan carpenter's avatar

OK!!!!!! WHAT the HECK DO WE NEED LAWS FOR TO PROTECT US IN OUR COUNTRY????? WHY DO WE NEED A Show DOG...supreme COURT JUSTICE SYSTEM ⚖️ THAT CANT ADJUST Common sense OUT OF OUR CONSTITUTION OR AMENDMENTS FOR US CITIZENS OF AMERICA TO BE SAFE AND PROTECT THIS GREAT NATION....THEY NEED TO PRAYTO GOD..ALMIGHTY !!!!!!THE TRUE LAW GIVER ✝️ AND GET THEIR HEADS OUT OF THE MUD!

THANK YOU MISS JULIE KELLY 🇺🇲 ⚖️⚖️⚖️⚖️🔥🗽✝️🦅❤️🤍💙🇺🇲🌹

IM SO TICKED 🤬

Expand full comment
WvVet's avatar

My question is...is President just going to let these judges destroy his presidency? He seems to still have faith in the SC. I don't know many people who do.

Expand full comment
Cara Wakefield's avatar

The power of TDS still astonishes me. It can make even an SC judge look a complete fool. Way to destroy your legacy, Roberts.

Expand full comment
Charles Wemyss, Jr.'s avatar

Hard to imagine supposedly legal scholars that achieve the vaunted level of a Supreme Court judge didn’t know that they were sowing the seeds of discontent and confusion. It is okay for a senior senator from NY to threaten SCOTUS judges, it is okay to have a university like Harvard practice discrimination in its admissions process, but Lord help the President of the United States when he or she attempts to exercise their prerogatives in the Executive Branch of Government. Those judges all knew exactly what mayhem they were creating, they just wanted to punt the issues back to lower courts to keep the clock moving, every hour of delay is an hour less of Orangeman Bad in the Oval Office. Like those who wish to depose Vladimir Putin from his role as head of the Russian Federation, careful SCOTUS what you wish for, the next president may be a lot more draconian than the one you’re trying to stop. Or the people will determine the game is rigged. Then all bets are off. Once a revolution starts it doesn’t stop until it runs out of steam or human capital to keep it going.

Expand full comment
Robert Yates's avatar

"vaunted level of a Supreme Court judge didn’t know that they were sowing the seeds of discontent and confusion"

They know it but they hate Trump so bad that they don't care if they hurt the country as long as it hurts Trump.

Expand full comment
Randy Hill's avatar

Everyone should use Duck Duck Go’s bowser and encrypted email because of their security.

Expand full comment
Peatucker's avatar

Julie, Suddenly Safari will not open your articles. I have no trouble with any other substacks opening so it tells me you are being censored. As I am a paying customer I sure would love to continue reading your articles. Can you check on your end and see if they are censoring you? Thanks. JD Dukes

Expand full comment
John Stalmach's avatar

No problems with Safari here. Comments opened right away, and the link to "Read" also works.

Expand full comment