On Independence Day, Eastman presents his argument in support of President Trump's birthright citizenship proclamation and his criticism of SCOTUS' dissent in universal preliminary injunction matter.
Is it not possible to place the ignorance of Justice Sotomayor up in lights so that the country can clearly see she is one dumb and duplicitous agent placed on the bench to ruin this nation? She should be removed either by a tsunami or ridicule or through a deep investigation of her nomination showing fraud and duplicity.
This is well written and worth the time to read it. People’s interpretations of the 14th amendment really don’t matter, it’s what the law says.
I find it sorry that a member of SCOTUS finds it necessary to parse sentences, which in turn, convolutes the meaning when stating historical precedent.
Thanks for posting this amazingly education piece from John Eastman, Julie. All it indicates is something that I have known for years, which is that Justice Sotomayor is one of the dumbest Supreme Court Justices ever nominated and confirmed by the Unites States Senate. Although she has stiff competition from the most recently nominated and confirmed Supreme Court Justice. I believe it's safe to conjecture that their combined IQ doesn't even come close to double digits. And to think that they will be on SCOTUS until they retire or die...
Rumor has it that she is being controlled..it amazes me that these justices think they are there to vote their opinion or feelings. When they took their oath and accepted the judgeship, they were brought under protecting, defending and following the constitution. But as a lot of lawyers, they do not know constitutional law. And I wonder IF they ever read the constitution or were taught the constitution in law school. Surprisingly, most are not.
Unfortunately, I have determined for many years that J. Sotomayor does judge from an emotional perspective frequently, rather than law, facts, and historical precedent. A slight difference from low IQ, but nonetheless interfering with justice.
Oops I inadvertently sent my message too soon. As always Julie your stories are interesting to read and thank you for your great journalism! So now what will happen?
Is it not possible to place the ignorance of Justice Sotomayor up in lights so that the country can clearly see she is one dumb and duplicitous agent placed on the bench to ruin this nation? She should be removed either by a tsunami or ridicule or through a deep investigation of her nomination showing fraud and duplicity.
She and her DEI hire "friend" Jackson!
It's the Dumb and Dumberer Court!
Epic. Hard to imagine this level of Dumb getting past first year law. Shows how badly our law schools have deteriorated.
Spot on!
This is well written and worth the time to read it. People’s interpretations of the 14th amendment really don’t matter, it’s what the law says.
I find it sorry that a member of SCOTUS finds it necessary to parse sentences, which in turn, convolutes the meaning when stating historical precedent.
But isn't that typical for Democrat weasels?
Unfortunately.
Thanks for posting this amazingly education piece from John Eastman, Julie. All it indicates is something that I have known for years, which is that Justice Sotomayor is one of the dumbest Supreme Court Justices ever nominated and confirmed by the Unites States Senate. Although she has stiff competition from the most recently nominated and confirmed Supreme Court Justice. I believe it's safe to conjecture that their combined IQ doesn't even come close to double digits. And to think that they will be on SCOTUS until they retire or die...
Dumb or duplicitous? I vote for the latter willful ignorance on the Supreme Court is not an option.
Rumor has it that she is being controlled..it amazes me that these justices think they are there to vote their opinion or feelings. When they took their oath and accepted the judgeship, they were brought under protecting, defending and following the constitution. But as a lot of lawyers, they do not know constitutional law. And I wonder IF they ever read the constitution or were taught the constitution in law school. Surprisingly, most are not.
Unfortunately, I have determined for many years that J. Sotomayor does judge from an emotional perspective frequently, rather than law, facts, and historical precedent. A slight difference from low IQ, but nonetheless interfering with justice.
Thank you for your clarification Dr Eastman
Oops I inadvertently sent my message too soon. As always Julie your stories are interesting to read and thank you for your great journalism! So now what will happen?
Thanks Doc. Please accept my apologies for everything the CA Bar did to you.
Great Story Julie! If you can refresh me X