DC Judge Beryl Howell loves to shoot off her mouth when it comes to the president and his supporters. Now she's playing the victim as Trump DOJ uses her own words, and actions, against her.
Former Judge and Congressman Louie Gohmert today on Bannon said the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Jim Jordan, should call each of these judges to appear before them.
Yes, Louie texted me yesterday. He was the first Congressman to reach out to me in mid 2021 about the J6ers. Wish he was in Congress but I plan on helping him spread the word.
Judge Howell is clearly a threat to our Constitution, our Republic, and our liberty. She dose not deserve a position on the bench, but rather she deserves a full investigation and impeachment. It is incumbent upon the House to shine a bright light on this dangerous woman.
This truly is sad to me and scary. For over 10 years now, the attacks on President Trump have not diminished. The administrative state and all the bad actors are squashing the Will of the people.
That seems to be the game plan . The Marxists and corrupt Democrats, have seated crooked judges to stop Trump’. Millions don’t even recognize how our freedom to vote is being stolen from us. If this well orchestrated plan to take down a president continues, we will lose our country.
Two good decisions today. These are bad, bad people but litigation takes time. Today the circuit courts stayed the USAID order allowing Doge to go ahead and even the DV circuit as screwy as it is found that not letting the president fire two Biden appointees was likely unconstitutional as President Trump’s real said. So little by little. Lots of bad rulings to over come. It’ll happen.
It’s a pity that this sort of judicial over reach goes unreported by the main stream legacy media and unpunished by any form of offical sanction. One can only hope that when judge Howell slips her mortal coils and ascends to Heaven that she meets a couple of my fellow Marines, already there in their dress blues guarding the gates. As she presents herself to the Marines she gets a polite but clear response….”I’m sorry Ma’am you’re not on our list, afraid you will have to head over to that big red door that says “exit”.
“But but but where does that door go?” The judge will sputter…The young Sargent with the CIB and awards and decorations from the fight in the Republic of South Vietnam will reply “no idea lady, but we were in a Hell called Vietnam and if where you’re headed is anything like that, it’s gonna be a long eternity….” And with that the pneumatic exit door from heaven to hell will open and off the witch and her broomstick will go….
Keep after it Ms. Kelly your reporting in unrelenting force is a salve on our nations wounds!
To think you’ve had to endure the in-person scathing lectures this nasty person has inflicted on many a victim makes me admire your tolerance Julie. Feminist bullies are the worst and they receive little pushback. As a woman, I’m embarrassed by her condescending disrespect for people with other opinions. I don’t care how career successful she “thinks” she is, she is nothing but a scold and bully abusively yielding undeserved power. There is a remedy for whoever mistakenly approved her judicial appointment. It’s built into our Constitution even if CJ Robert’s thinks it’s a dirty word. “Impeachment ” is in order here.
She sits at a position of high power and abuses that power as a mean girl bully for the tribal validation of her feminist peer group and then shrinks into a victim cocoon that her feminist peer group also applauds.
I often wonder if the reason people like Howell behave so badly is that she, as a female, don't face the same risk as males for being "punched in the face" in response to her bullying. If you think deeply about this situation, we have a conflict in evolution where real discrimination, this tendency for males to treat females differently than males... including tolerating some of their more emotive and extreme behavior and being "chivalrous" and "understanding", is both at odds with the situation where females have rocketed upward in power and the corresponding need for real equality. Stupid men accept bad behavior in women because they crave pets from those women. However, there are a lot of both men and women that cannot wrap their head around actual real equality where females and males should face the same response for their bad behavior.
Trump demonstrates that he is more evolved than the average person. He is completely gender-neutral and responds to all badly behaving people the same... no matter which of their 52 claimed genders. Ironically this causes the feminist hive of Howell to claim Trump misogyny. Because bullies like Howell want their bully cake and eat it too. It is good for everyone that Trump ignores that artificial victim posture and punches her in the face like she deserves.
Interesting to hear her speak. I would have thought with her legal training and experience as a lawyer and a judge she'd be better at public speaking. She's in the habit of making this odd little pushing away gesture with her hands. Most unimpressive.
I guess the event serves the same purpose as all the awards and dinners for journalists- an attempt to elevate what they do and make them feel better about themselves.
All the names called out in recognition are from just one side. Theirs.
As Julie reported in depth, Judge Howell pierced Trump's attorney-client privilege using the crime exception. She also ruled or influenced her courthouse that Trump had no presidential privileges which entangled Navarro and Bannon into House contempt charges/sentences. Biden's DOJ was fishing for anything damaging while sharing advice inside the White House.
Well, in keeping with the theme of Julie's essay, what is to prevent the same thing from happening to Howell? The judicial equivalent to a White House advisor are the judge's former clerks and staff. Can they be grilled about what Howell was muttering about inside her own chambers? Did she use naughty words indicating biases against Republicans? Did she make judgments prior to hearing any evidence? Julie thoughtfully added some video clips. Can these people be deposed as well? Etc., etc.
Later, the Supreme Court struggled with putting the genie back in the bottle regarding Presidential immunity because it touches closely with the same immunity protecting judges. The issue quickly becomes Article II versus Article III that Howell jumped into the middle of. Jack Smith took full advantage of the DC Circuit that went off the rails.
Navarro was a White House advisor until the last day; Bannon was a former advisor that allowed the DC judges to dance with the law. Made Steve the only person serving time in a federal penitentiary for a misdemeanor. Literally a contradiction in terms. So how would Beryl shield her law clerks from 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024? It is mainly tradition of "fair play" that prevents harsh interrogations of former clerks. How would she fight it now given her own rulings regarding Trump associates?
Piercing the sanctity of a judge's private conversations with colleagues, clerks and staff would freak them out. Bigly! Consider the civil lawsuits if we learn that the presiding judge gets ratted out.
Tattle-tales run amuck. Former clerks would become pawns in a political high stakes game.
I bet the smarties in Trump 47 White House may have similar or meaner ideas. Strap in for some choppy waters. Judges are doing more pondering than ever before looking for an off ramp.
What an excellent idea! Howell would go crazy with madness if the tables were turned on her. We cannot depend on Congress to do a thing about these rouge judges! Republicans are going to have to learn to turn the tables or this behavior will never change.
But it was Howell in fact who declared a kind of martial law – – ignoring Anglo-Saxon legal customs and statutory bail and sentencing guidelines in order to deny bail, mandate grossly unfair pre-trial detentions, and then insist on cruel long sentences that bore no relationship to the “crime”. Misdemeanors and felonies with real victims, unlike here, were let off the hook. So many of the January 6 prisoners had served their country in the military, with unblemished records. It was shameful.
This whole process has been sickening for those of us who knew Howell was turning our bill of rights upside down, undoing one of the great achievements of the American Republic compared to European countries.
Has Donald effectively declared Martial Law by way of his treatment of Khalil regarding suppression of First Amendment in the name of Zionism? He and Rubio show contempt for the rule of law so that the cry baby Israelis might be “protected “. Not to change the subject, but I agree strongly with Julie on them matter of Howell. Food for thought.
The first half of your paragraph reads as a combo TDS rant and current far left we hate Israel pablum. Adding the last two sentences doesn't make it a coherent post.
Donald Trump's DOJ has not incarcerated such protestors. The right to speak freely without government interference does not mean that the government must supply a platform, a microphone, a stadium or lecture space or allow speakers and protestors to confiscate University property to proselytize without permission from the rightful authorities. Furthermore, these speakers are promulgating more than discourse. And that includes Khalil. They are interfering with more than the rights of others to be educated. That alone is enough to have a foreign national deported. They are also stoking rage and provoking violence which then befalls not only the most innocent but especially those whose only crime is the religion they were born into. If anything a government's job is to protect citizens from violence and sometimes the cause of such violence has to be removed. Too many pro Palestinians cannot handle speakers who herald their causes without becoming violent. It is that violent mentality that bloomed on October 7 and such historical reference makes for real concern. Authorities put emphasis on prevention which considers both protestors and locations. Sometimes the mix is combustible.
Your post is essentially cry baby Zionist propaganda. Glenn Greenwald and others have pointed out SCOTUS precedents defending the speech rights of all.
Donald & The Israelites have shown that the campaign promise to protect free speech is but lip service. Why is it that the Zionists offer only appeals to emotion? Why can't they use logic and reason and legal analysis instead of bullying and braggadocio?
I'm half Syrian and half Italian-- Grandparents are from Aleppo. I am 100 percent Constitutional. Too many people think that supporting the law is synonymous with supporting some nationality or gender issue.
The Chief Executive, for no reason whatsoever, can deport any non-citizen. Khalil does not have to be charged with any crime to be deported. Students on Visas do not have to be charged with a crime nor do ambassadors have to be charged with a crime to be deported. They are all guests. If they are indicted they deserve due process but can still be, simultaneously, deported and, sometimes, also, be incarcerated in America or elsewhere. No judge can prevent deportation of non-citizens. A judge can, perhaps, intervene when a person is indicted. Khalil has not been indicted.
Why should I embrace your claim? Glenn Greenwald (and others) is a US citizen and attorney. Though I have not yet read the cases, he says that precedent is well established showing that a green card holder IS entitled to certain rights.
No offense Task, but I must believe Glenn over you.
Glenn Greenwald is wrong if he said that and I'm not certain you even understood what he implied. Furthermore I don't care if you wish to remain uneducated. Of course a Green Card holder is entitled to certain rights. Progressives assume people don't know that. Concentrate on what the Green Card holder is not entitled to but the President is.
When are they going to be charged as a group for insurrection and treason? That is what they are doing. Insurrection to block a legally elected president from doing his job by interfering and treason against we the people who elected him. They need to go th the gulag and held without bond until they appear before a jusge.
Thanks for this update, Julie, on one of the most egregious examples of the members of the Marxists-Wearing-Black-Robes who presided over the Soviet-Style-Show-Trials inside Moscow-on-the-Potomac pertaining to the Constitutionally allowed protest in J6. It's amazing to me that she and her colleagues had no problem with the authoritarian behavior of H. Hussein's third term with his sock-puppet Chi-Com Joe (eg. EV mandates; Chi-Com Wuhan shot mandates, etc.) but, damn, she certainly hates President Donald Trump, doesn't she? Not only should she recuse herself from any matter that includes President Donald Trump, but she and all of her corrupt colleagues should be impeached and driven from the perches atop the establishment of our current Judicial Oligarchy. This group of unelected tyrants believe they truly run the Federal government and shouldn't ever be challenged. One and only be prayerful and hopeful that the Supreme Court renders decisions that will rein-in these lower tier district judges who have commandeered the authority given to President Donald Trump via Article 2 of the United States Constitution. Of course, that means we will have to rely upon the judgment of the Chief Justice and the nominal female Conservative Justice. God help us...
Maddening...She talks about the "rise of authoritarianism" and "a time of testing" because she and her fellow travelers in the DC courts are "all about the facts." She should consider the fact of the rise of judicial tyranny where district judges are aggressively veering out of their lane for a head on collision with the Executive Branch. Her DC gang wield their bullying behavior with a perceived power imbalance, daring President Trump to challenge them.
Former Judge and Congressman Louie Gohmert today on Bannon said the House Judiciary Committee, chaired by Jim Jordan, should call each of these judges to appear before them.
Yes, Louie texted me yesterday. He was the first Congressman to reach out to me in mid 2021 about the J6ers. Wish he was in Congress but I plan on helping him spread the word.
I’m not surprised he was one of the first to contact you. In 2019-20 Breitbart said he was one of the first at the border. Physically AT the border.
apparent debased human masquerading as a good person. I wonder how she will see herself once she enters the depths of hell.
As ugly on the inside as she is on the outside.
As Curley would say: “I’m a victim of soikemstance!"
Judge Howell is clearly a threat to our Constitution, our Republic, and our liberty. She dose not deserve a position on the bench, but rather she deserves a full investigation and impeachment. It is incumbent upon the House to shine a bright light on this dangerous woman.
This truly is sad to me and scary. For over 10 years now, the attacks on President Trump have not diminished. The administrative state and all the bad actors are squashing the Will of the people.
That seems to be the game plan . The Marxists and corrupt Democrats, have seated crooked judges to stop Trump’. Millions don’t even recognize how our freedom to vote is being stolen from us. If this well orchestrated plan to take down a president continues, we will lose our country.
Two good decisions today. These are bad, bad people but litigation takes time. Today the circuit courts stayed the USAID order allowing Doge to go ahead and even the DV circuit as screwy as it is found that not letting the president fire two Biden appointees was likely unconstitutional as President Trump’s real said. So little by little. Lots of bad rulings to over come. It’ll happen.
It’s a pity that this sort of judicial over reach goes unreported by the main stream legacy media and unpunished by any form of offical sanction. One can only hope that when judge Howell slips her mortal coils and ascends to Heaven that she meets a couple of my fellow Marines, already there in their dress blues guarding the gates. As she presents herself to the Marines she gets a polite but clear response….”I’m sorry Ma’am you’re not on our list, afraid you will have to head over to that big red door that says “exit”.
“But but but where does that door go?” The judge will sputter…The young Sargent with the CIB and awards and decorations from the fight in the Republic of South Vietnam will reply “no idea lady, but we were in a Hell called Vietnam and if where you’re headed is anything like that, it’s gonna be a long eternity….” And with that the pneumatic exit door from heaven to hell will open and off the witch and her broomstick will go….
Keep after it Ms. Kelly your reporting in unrelenting force is a salve on our nations wounds!
To think you’ve had to endure the in-person scathing lectures this nasty person has inflicted on many a victim makes me admire your tolerance Julie. Feminist bullies are the worst and they receive little pushback. As a woman, I’m embarrassed by her condescending disrespect for people with other opinions. I don’t care how career successful she “thinks” she is, she is nothing but a scold and bully abusively yielding undeserved power. There is a remedy for whoever mistakenly approved her judicial appointment. It’s built into our Constitution even if CJ Robert’s thinks it’s a dirty word. “Impeachment ” is in order here.
She sits at a position of high power and abuses that power as a mean girl bully for the tribal validation of her feminist peer group and then shrinks into a victim cocoon that her feminist peer group also applauds.
I often wonder if the reason people like Howell behave so badly is that she, as a female, don't face the same risk as males for being "punched in the face" in response to her bullying. If you think deeply about this situation, we have a conflict in evolution where real discrimination, this tendency for males to treat females differently than males... including tolerating some of their more emotive and extreme behavior and being "chivalrous" and "understanding", is both at odds with the situation where females have rocketed upward in power and the corresponding need for real equality. Stupid men accept bad behavior in women because they crave pets from those women. However, there are a lot of both men and women that cannot wrap their head around actual real equality where females and males should face the same response for their bad behavior.
Trump demonstrates that he is more evolved than the average person. He is completely gender-neutral and responds to all badly behaving people the same... no matter which of their 52 claimed genders. Ironically this causes the feminist hive of Howell to claim Trump misogyny. Because bullies like Howell want their bully cake and eat it too. It is good for everyone that Trump ignores that artificial victim posture and punches her in the face like she deserves.
Interesting to hear her speak. I would have thought with her legal training and experience as a lawyer and a judge she'd be better at public speaking. She's in the habit of making this odd little pushing away gesture with her hands. Most unimpressive.
I guess the event serves the same purpose as all the awards and dinners for journalists- an attempt to elevate what they do and make them feel better about themselves.
All the names called out in recognition are from just one side. Theirs.
As Julie reported in depth, Judge Howell pierced Trump's attorney-client privilege using the crime exception. She also ruled or influenced her courthouse that Trump had no presidential privileges which entangled Navarro and Bannon into House contempt charges/sentences. Biden's DOJ was fishing for anything damaging while sharing advice inside the White House.
Well, in keeping with the theme of Julie's essay, what is to prevent the same thing from happening to Howell? The judicial equivalent to a White House advisor are the judge's former clerks and staff. Can they be grilled about what Howell was muttering about inside her own chambers? Did she use naughty words indicating biases against Republicans? Did she make judgments prior to hearing any evidence? Julie thoughtfully added some video clips. Can these people be deposed as well? Etc., etc.
Later, the Supreme Court struggled with putting the genie back in the bottle regarding Presidential immunity because it touches closely with the same immunity protecting judges. The issue quickly becomes Article II versus Article III that Howell jumped into the middle of. Jack Smith took full advantage of the DC Circuit that went off the rails.
Navarro was a White House advisor until the last day; Bannon was a former advisor that allowed the DC judges to dance with the law. Made Steve the only person serving time in a federal penitentiary for a misdemeanor. Literally a contradiction in terms. So how would Beryl shield her law clerks from 2021, 2022, 2023, 2024? It is mainly tradition of "fair play" that prevents harsh interrogations of former clerks. How would she fight it now given her own rulings regarding Trump associates?
Piercing the sanctity of a judge's private conversations with colleagues, clerks and staff would freak them out. Bigly! Consider the civil lawsuits if we learn that the presiding judge gets ratted out.
Tattle-tales run amuck. Former clerks would become pawns in a political high stakes game.
I bet the smarties in Trump 47 White House may have similar or meaner ideas. Strap in for some choppy waters. Judges are doing more pondering than ever before looking for an off ramp.
What an excellent idea! Howell would go crazy with madness if the tables were turned on her. We cannot depend on Congress to do a thing about these rouge judges! Republicans are going to have to learn to turn the tables or this behavior will never change.
Notice how hideous these radical democrats are.
Declare Martial Law and clean out the swamp!
But it was Howell in fact who declared a kind of martial law – – ignoring Anglo-Saxon legal customs and statutory bail and sentencing guidelines in order to deny bail, mandate grossly unfair pre-trial detentions, and then insist on cruel long sentences that bore no relationship to the “crime”. Misdemeanors and felonies with real victims, unlike here, were let off the hook. So many of the January 6 prisoners had served their country in the military, with unblemished records. It was shameful.
This whole process has been sickening for those of us who knew Howell was turning our bill of rights upside down, undoing one of the great achievements of the American Republic compared to European countries.
Has Donald effectively declared Martial Law by way of his treatment of Khalil regarding suppression of First Amendment in the name of Zionism? He and Rubio show contempt for the rule of law so that the cry baby Israelis might be “protected “. Not to change the subject, but I agree strongly with Julie on them matter of Howell. Food for thought.
The first half of your paragraph reads as a combo TDS rant and current far left we hate Israel pablum. Adding the last two sentences doesn't make it a coherent post.
Rhetorical questions are rants? It sounds like your worldview is threatened by certain facts regarding Zionist practices. Pity.
Donald Trump's DOJ has not incarcerated such protestors. The right to speak freely without government interference does not mean that the government must supply a platform, a microphone, a stadium or lecture space or allow speakers and protestors to confiscate University property to proselytize without permission from the rightful authorities. Furthermore, these speakers are promulgating more than discourse. And that includes Khalil. They are interfering with more than the rights of others to be educated. That alone is enough to have a foreign national deported. They are also stoking rage and provoking violence which then befalls not only the most innocent but especially those whose only crime is the religion they were born into. If anything a government's job is to protect citizens from violence and sometimes the cause of such violence has to be removed. Too many pro Palestinians cannot handle speakers who herald their causes without becoming violent. It is that violent mentality that bloomed on October 7 and such historical reference makes for real concern. Authorities put emphasis on prevention which considers both protestors and locations. Sometimes the mix is combustible.
Your post is essentially cry baby Zionist propaganda. Glenn Greenwald and others have pointed out SCOTUS precedents defending the speech rights of all.
Donald & The Israelites have shown that the campaign promise to protect free speech is but lip service. Why is it that the Zionists offer only appeals to emotion? Why can't they use logic and reason and legal analysis instead of bullying and braggadocio?
I'm half Syrian and half Italian-- Grandparents are from Aleppo. I am 100 percent Constitutional. Too many people think that supporting the law is synonymous with supporting some nationality or gender issue.
The Chief Executive, for no reason whatsoever, can deport any non-citizen. Khalil does not have to be charged with any crime to be deported. Students on Visas do not have to be charged with a crime nor do ambassadors have to be charged with a crime to be deported. They are all guests. If they are indicted they deserve due process but can still be, simultaneously, deported and, sometimes, also, be incarcerated in America or elsewhere. No judge can prevent deportation of non-citizens. A judge can, perhaps, intervene when a person is indicted. Khalil has not been indicted.
Why should I embrace your claim? Glenn Greenwald (and others) is a US citizen and attorney. Though I have not yet read the cases, he says that precedent is well established showing that a green card holder IS entitled to certain rights.
No offense Task, but I must believe Glenn over you.
Glenn Greenwald is wrong if he said that and I'm not certain you even understood what he implied. Furthermore I don't care if you wish to remain uneducated. Of course a Green Card holder is entitled to certain rights. Progressives assume people don't know that. Concentrate on what the Green Card holder is not entitled to but the President is.
If you don’t like Julie’s writing or the opinions expressed on this substack, maybe consider leaving.
Would you be kind enough to tell me what exactly it was that I said about Julie's writing that suggested I don't like it?
You’re assuming motivation. Let’s see what the process reveals.
Sorry 😞 MISS JULIE KELLY..I DIDN'T THANK YOU IN MY COMMENT....THANK YOU MISS JULIE KELLY 🇺🇲 ⚖️ ⚖️⚖️⚖️⚖️⚖️💥🗽🇺🇸❤️💙✝️
USA 🇺🇸
When are they going to be charged as a group for insurrection and treason? That is what they are doing. Insurrection to block a legally elected president from doing his job by interfering and treason against we the people who elected him. They need to go th the gulag and held without bond until they appear before a jusge.
Thanks for this update, Julie, on one of the most egregious examples of the members of the Marxists-Wearing-Black-Robes who presided over the Soviet-Style-Show-Trials inside Moscow-on-the-Potomac pertaining to the Constitutionally allowed protest in J6. It's amazing to me that she and her colleagues had no problem with the authoritarian behavior of H. Hussein's third term with his sock-puppet Chi-Com Joe (eg. EV mandates; Chi-Com Wuhan shot mandates, etc.) but, damn, she certainly hates President Donald Trump, doesn't she? Not only should she recuse herself from any matter that includes President Donald Trump, but she and all of her corrupt colleagues should be impeached and driven from the perches atop the establishment of our current Judicial Oligarchy. This group of unelected tyrants believe they truly run the Federal government and shouldn't ever be challenged. One and only be prayerful and hopeful that the Supreme Court renders decisions that will rein-in these lower tier district judges who have commandeered the authority given to President Donald Trump via Article 2 of the United States Constitution. Of course, that means we will have to rely upon the judgment of the Chief Justice and the nominal female Conservative Justice. God help us...
Maddening...She talks about the "rise of authoritarianism" and "a time of testing" because she and her fellow travelers in the DC courts are "all about the facts." She should consider the fact of the rise of judicial tyranny where district judges are aggressively veering out of their lane for a head on collision with the Executive Branch. Her DC gang wield their bullying behavior with a perceived power imbalance, daring President Trump to challenge them.
Howell…POS.