The Obama appointee's antics in court and out-of-order rulings in favor of Special Counsel Jack Smith demonstrate her recklessness and partisan interest in advancing a dead letter case.
Disgraceful attention seeker. Perhaps she's auditioning to be the next TV judge. I'm just going to say it, but I've had enough of these so called "strong, women of color" bitch slapping their way across the legislative and judicial scene. I'm sick of it, and offended, as a woman myself. They're denigrate all of us in their quest to be the tough guy.
Cara Wakefield is correct in noting the "disgraceful attention seeker." However, it is much deeper than that. Take Judge Juan Merchan as an example. He presided over the DA Alvin Bragg prosecution of Donald Trump. He knew that Bragg had hijacked the trial by permitting extrajudicial publicity against Trump through the New York Times and the so-called insider account of Trump's guilt through the publishing house of Simon and Schuster. The aim in doing it was to extrajudicially influence the jury to get a guilty verdict. All of this was disbarment level professional misconduct committed by Bragg's office and Merchan made sure that that illicit activity was covered up. Here is a newsletter, published just four days ago that documents this. It is entitled: "This is the Professional Conduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the Record of New York DA Alvin Bragg. Part Four." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
"Judge" Chutkan approaches this case with an obvious bias against President Trump. Yes; I recognize that he is not the current President. However, he was when the events being explored in this case took place, and his position at the time influences the outcome of this case.
I have never seen a case where a judge is doing as much as possible to have a case result in a reversal. It shows a complete lack of integrity and faithfulness to the law. But then she has the gall to say that the Supreme Court's guidance is "subject to many different readings".
Like, how big is that pile of 0bama that she wallows in for her to make a statement that moronic?
Just like "Judge" Juan Merchan, she is trying to rush a case through without any respect for the applicable law.
To be honest, I don't think she read SCOTUS immunity opinion. Her misrepresentations in court as to what the court decided either a product of ignorance or willful deceit.
i wish SCOTUS would hold judges like Chutcan who ignore their rulings in contempt. I don't see any way that the rule of law will be restored in courts in New York and DC until it costs judges something when they ignore it.
Trading sn opinion and attempting to objectively comprehend and implement an opinion are unfortunately not related in this era of extreme politicization of everything, even in the case of an unfortunately large segment of the judicial branch.. it is similar to the ay the majorities of the Ivy League colleges have thumbed their nose at the SCOTUS decision regarding race based admissions. The center van no longer hold, to paraphrase Yeats.
Julie Kelly: Please see the Runnymede Report reply to Cara Wakefield and The Runnymede Report reply to Kevin Beck, particularly when it comes to willful deceit.
Well actually, Kevin, I believe you have seen this numerous times in this campaign to "get Donald Trump". As you say, Chutkan and Merchan but also Engoron and the opposition toward Aileen Cannon plus the posse of lawyers inclusive of James, Bragg, Willis, Wade and then add in the Secretaries of State across this nation that also mounted twin playbook gamesmanship with their single minded display of "let's see how we can sht down Trump's throat this time!" quarterbacking play action of a sort of famished dedication even to killing President Trump!
It has a junk yard dog attachment to the scrap of meat, at all costs, deliberate snap shot and sound bite Mount Rushmore sizing for all to see and feel with that bite of the rapier sword in our gut!
This is a great quote from Kevin Beck. "Judge Chutkan approaches this case with an obvious bias against President Trump." And then, "It shows a complete lack of integrity and faithfulness to the law." Yes the judge is required to be neutral and not biased. And yes, it shows a complete lack of integrity and faithfulness to the law." However, there is a much bigger layer of dishonesty involved here. Integrity and faithfulness is the foundation of the entire practice of law of the prosecutors, the state bar associations and the judges who oversee both. The complete lack of integrity and faithfulness to the law as governed by the rules of professional conduct were tossed out the window in the New York DA Alvin Bragg prosecution of Trump.
The trial judge oversaw this corruption with the illicit help of the state bar association in New York. Here's how it was done as documented in a newsletter, published just four days ago.
It is entitled: This is the Professional Misconduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the
You’re too busy doing the heavy lifting on these stories to be responsible for the comic relief. BTW, Beryl Howell finally sentenced me just in time to “keep me from participating in the election cycle”. She exceeded both the probation recommendations and the sentencing guideline recommendations, justifying the excessive sentence by stating I posed a “threat to democracy” and damaged America’s reputation on the world stage. Ben Bartee wrote a nice summary on PJ media: https://pjmedia.com/benbartee/2024/09/13/exclusive-nonviolent-j6-granny-slapped-with-bitter-sentence-n4932494
Thank you. What has happened to my husband and I is happening to people all over the country, from pro-life demonstrators to former President Trump. Thank God for people like Julie Kelley why continue to shine the light of truth on the situation. I don’t like what is happening to me but I am even more concerned about what is happening to the greatest nation ever conceived. I pray the turnout makes the election too big to rig.
Like many of her colleagues, she covers her lack of intelligence with arrogance, haughtiness and smirking a la Kamala Harris. These people should not be near a courtroom.
It is imperative that a team of investigative journalists do a deep dive on this rogue judge. We need to know everything about her life, about her influences, about her corruption. As long as she plays at being rogue, tearing down our judicial system, we need to know everything. All her actions and her words now need to be made public, as well as her finances and her covert handlers. What hidden crimes exist in her background.
While I love your passion and direction, I think there's a simpler process.
Defund and shut down the entire DC circuit.
Make it clear that all affected personnel can only be rehired after proof that they were not complicit in the ludicrous injustice dished out under their administrations. And their rehire should be subject to 66% approval of J6 misdemeanor convicts.
All pending cases get moved to the jurisdiction of their residence.
This is an incredibly fantastic quote: "Shut down the DC federal courthouse, the DC US attorney's office, and the Washington FBI field office. The axis of evil."
There are layers upon layers of this axis of evil that are protected by the news media.
We can consider the state bar associations: They are viewed, through the lens of the news media, as "sacred cows." They are never subject to audit. They are never subject to review of any kind by anyone, especially the judiciary. The reality is the opposite of this perception. If they intentionally fail to prosecute offenders, such as in the Trump illicit prosecutions, they themselves are required to be disbarred. So, going back to Julie Kelly's comment: These offices also need to be "shut down." Then we can get back to restoring the republic the way it is supposed to be.
This is a great quote from Pete Healey: "Make it clear that all affected personnel can only be rehired after proof that they were not complicit in the ludicrous injustice dished out under their administrations." This is not a radical idea. But it goes much deeper. The entire legal profession is governed by rules of professional conduct. It too needs a complete overhaul. The rules say that any judge, any prosecutor, any state bar association, any lawyer, who has information brought to his or her attention that disbarment worthy professional misconduct is afoot is required to report it so it doesn't happen again (if they don't report they themselves are guilty of professional misconduct. And yet widespread misconduct is occurring through our prosecutors who remove fair trial rights of politically targeted defendants. Here is a newsletter, published in May, which documents how these rules work. It is entitled: "How the American Judiciary Became Utterly Dishonest." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/how-the-american-judiciary-became-8c2?r=3tdx2w Despite the clear requirements of the rules of professional misconduct this cabal went all out against Trump in the New York DA Alvin Bragg prosecution against Trump. Notice that the news media covered this up. So did the legal scholars and legal commentators. Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
Excellent work. Yes, the legal profession has tumbled down a steep slope into corruption. My experience taught me that the system, including major dispute resolution providers such as FINRA, has crumbled. (For example, I was shocked at the ease with which FINRA executives were willing to perjure themselves in a Federal Court in order to avoid responsibility for their actions. And they are supposed to be in charge of helping others resolve legal disputes!) My observation is that the "ethics" portions of classes in law schools focus on "what can I get away with" rather than instilling ethical character. Zealous advocacy (including pursuit of political goals) has become the jungle norm. I've worked with amazing judges, but also have now come to see the incompetence and bias of the bench at this time. It would seem we should require additional training before seating someone on the bench; perhaps we should require completion of an LLM focused on jurisprudence.
This a great comment by david. In the traditional legal sense, malpractice can be either negligent, reckless or intentional. When it comes to the judiciary, they fall in the category of intentional malpractice. They know better and wilfully and intentionally assure that the corruption continues. One of the great deceptions is that are only governed by the judicial ethics rules which decidedly have no bite to them. What does have bite are the rules of professional conduct that govern all lawyers, prosecutors, state bar associations and judges.
If they intentionally break the rules they need to be prosecuted by means of disbarment from the practice of law. Here is a great breakdown illustrating this corruption in action all the way up to the Supreme Court. It is in a newsletter, published just four days ago. It is entitled: This is the Professional Misconduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the Record of New York
That "judge" is part of an evil cabal dedicated to destroying America. I hope when Mr. Trump wins, he cuts all aid to New York until the rotten state of corruption has been expunged from that debased state.
DC Goodman makes a great point about the rotten state of corruption in New York. Judge Merchan presided over a corrupt trial against Trump. But the corruption is much deeper than
suspected. The entire foundation of our legal system was overthrown in this prosecution,
not in the absurd legal theories brought by Bragg and accepted by Merchan, but rather the
overthrow of the defendant's right to be presumed innocent and his right to have a fair and impartial trial. DA Alvin Bragg office prosecuted the case through the New York Times and the publishing house of Simon and Schuster in a tell-all book against Trump. How corrupt was it?
It broke a central tenet of the rules of professional conduct. The prosecutor is forbidden from telling the public about the case outside of the judicial process. It's disbarment stuff. Yet, the entire judicial process starting with Judge Juan Merchan, extending up through the judicial chain and covered up the Grievance Committee of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court perpetrated this gross abuse of the Fifth and the Sixth Amendment. What do the rules of professional conduct say? All involved must need be disbarred. Here is a newsletter, published just four days ago, that documents this travesty, which screams for massive removals. It is entitled "This is the Professional Misconduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the Record of New York DA Alvin Bragg. Part Four." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
I am, as so many Americans, sick and tired of the rabid and biased MSM, law-fare, Dems and DNC “ends justifying the means”, scheming by the intelligence community and outright imbalance of justice by the DOJ. How does this end? Is it only when Trump is no longer a target (no pun intended) or will Trump out of the picture only allow the machine do as it wants.
Hold on, I thought AG Garland just said the Justice System would not go after political opponents and weaponize the DOJ even though he is indirectly calling all the shots. These people need to be removed from office ASAP. One more of the many reasons we need Trump elected as POTUS!!
Wasn't that infuriating? What gall and arrogance. But what it signaled to me is Garland knows at least half the country does not trust the DOJ. Apparently he thinks if he says over and over that DOJ decisions are not political and everyone is treated equally, we will fall for his bunk. Not happening.
Well said Julie! My hatred for these people and the media cannot be measured. You and a few others like you are the only ones i truly believe, I can count them on one hand. I’m still shaking my head at the two despicable moderators from ABC, they truly destroyed their careers.
I was just thinking the same thing! Can you imagine what SCOTUS would be if he had been voted in by Congress! He is void of any Justice or reasonable thinking. All he and his DOJ and FBI have done is go after Trump! He will go down in history as a joke!
As always excellent analysis from the BEST DAMNED REPORTER OUT THERE!
(Can't read this without wondering how the Ship will try to criticize it for irrelevant reasons, once again... Kinda pisses me off he's infiltrated my thought process when reading your excellent work!)
But one minor nit to pick, Julie... Your conclusion is shortsighted.
There will be no "additional scrutiny" this case is done, kaput, over yet...
This is Smith/Chutkan's play...
The case is only being held together by duct tape piano wire and paste for another few chances to allow Smith a chance to present unsubstantiated but damning evidence to be presented in her courtroom for the Presstitutes to use to further defame PDJT.
Come 11/5, no one will care anymore. Either the case gets dismissed under the new DOJ or the fraudulent winners no longer have a reason to pursue the case, they will have achieved their goal.
(Lest you doubt me, Ship's penultimate post did a great job of clarifying - without stating - this factoid)
If Harris wins, they will pursue this case. I wouldn't be surprised if Smith seeks another superseding indictment after the election to add more charges based on Trump's post-election conduct. My point is that the case ultimately dies not because a Harris DOJ will give up but because scrutiny by DC appellate court in Fischer and another SCOTUS review of existing elements in indictment won't hold.
This is a great point, Julie Kelly. While they focus on going after Trump's post-election "conduct" the lure is too great for no one to look at the professional conduct of the
judiciary, the state bar associations and the prosecutors. We need to get the word out.
These institutions will continue their "axis of evil" until a knowledgeable and informed citizenry sees the corruption and is willing to put the pressure on to demand the removals. It is deeper than anticipated. We have 197 accredited law schools across the country led by Lawyer Deans and Lawyer Law professors who foundationally teach the importance of the Constitution's guarantees of a fair trial for an accused. Yet when Trump's rights are destroyed in the DA Bragg prosecution they had nothing to say.
Maybe I'm giving them more credit than they deserve, but I think even these fools know they have now chance on appeals and will drop it like a hot potato once they have run the election interference gambit for all it's worth.
(I'll keep you posted if the Ship chimes in, but I think he's finally figured out he's lost that match of wits.)
Give Donald a fast but fair trial, then take him out back and hang him! Reminds one of England in the 1800's, the country that shipped hundreds of thousands of Scots and Irish to 'the colonies', for daring to live on their own land.
This is a great point made by desmond oneill in bringing things back to England. It is widely known that the apex of western civilization is the Magna Carta. At the center of it is the doctrine of due process. The U.S. thought it was important enough to incorporate its tenets in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. That's called fair trial rights. So our prosecutors, judges and state bar associations have pushed the doctrine out of the way to fulfill political objectives. Worse, the news media has, through smoke and mirrors, convinced the American people that these rights don't even exist. Proof: Here is a newsletter, published four days ago, that documents this. It is entitled: "This is the Professional Misconduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the record of DA Alvin Bragg. Part Four." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
As a teacher of students with a myriad of ability levels (multiple disabilities, normal, autism, syndromes galore) I am pretty versed in recognizing someone who just wants reinforcement (negative or positive doesn't matter with them) because they just want any kind of attention. And I see that in Chutkan, through your experience of her. And now I also see just a bit of a sister-hood with Kamala Harris in the Jamaica connection. And then there's that proliferative arrogance that perspirates from every pore of her skin. And that too was evident from the constantly lying and perceived psychological baiting performance from that inimitable sister, Kamala, at the recent debate. Whell actually it was a deliberate set up "GOTCHA" interview of 3 on 1, a couple of days ago of harris, linsey and muir against Donald J. Trump!
It's pretty obvious that ALL of the players for Kamala and the conglomerate Demo crowd of deception machine tactical maneuver opposition are spewing the same game plan, albeit with inclement lies a plenty! And THAT SCRIPT has been employed for an inordinately long number of beyond 10 years.
I must say, the Deep State's deep state playbook is not only maddening but the level of depravity it produces takes similar twists and turns but also increasingly uglier presentations that bring deeper disgust that convinces me to not even begin to change my mind of total negativity toward the opposition. And I don't believe that I will ever offer a sliver of positive feeling for "them" anymore!
Disgraceful attention seeker. Perhaps she's auditioning to be the next TV judge. I'm just going to say it, but I've had enough of these so called "strong, women of color" bitch slapping their way across the legislative and judicial scene. I'm sick of it, and offended, as a woman myself. They're denigrate all of us in their quest to be the tough guy.
Well said! I agree 100%!
KimboThisIsMyCountry2: Please look at The Runnymede Report reply to Cara Wakefield and Kevin Beck.
Cara Wakefield is correct in noting the "disgraceful attention seeker." However, it is much deeper than that. Take Judge Juan Merchan as an example. He presided over the DA Alvin Bragg prosecution of Donald Trump. He knew that Bragg had hijacked the trial by permitting extrajudicial publicity against Trump through the New York Times and the so-called insider account of Trump's guilt through the publishing house of Simon and Schuster. The aim in doing it was to extrajudicially influence the jury to get a guilty verdict. All of this was disbarment level professional misconduct committed by Bragg's office and Merchan made sure that that illicit activity was covered up. Here is a newsletter, published just four days ago that documents this. It is entitled: "This is the Professional Conduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the Record of New York DA Alvin Bragg. Part Four." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
So much dirt to be dug up on these people. Thanks for the link.
"Judge" Chutkan approaches this case with an obvious bias against President Trump. Yes; I recognize that he is not the current President. However, he was when the events being explored in this case took place, and his position at the time influences the outcome of this case.
I have never seen a case where a judge is doing as much as possible to have a case result in a reversal. It shows a complete lack of integrity and faithfulness to the law. But then she has the gall to say that the Supreme Court's guidance is "subject to many different readings".
Like, how big is that pile of 0bama that she wallows in for her to make a statement that moronic?
Just like "Judge" Juan Merchan, she is trying to rush a case through without any respect for the applicable law.
Too bad she was such a mediocre dancer.
To be honest, I don't think she read SCOTUS immunity opinion. Her misrepresentations in court as to what the court decided either a product of ignorance or willful deceit.
i wish SCOTUS would hold judges like Chutcan who ignore their rulings in contempt. I don't see any way that the rule of law will be restored in courts in New York and DC until it costs judges something when they ignore it.
Agree wholeheartedly
Trading sn opinion and attempting to objectively comprehend and implement an opinion are unfortunately not related in this era of extreme politicization of everything, even in the case of an unfortunately large segment of the judicial branch.. it is similar to the ay the majorities of the Ivy League colleges have thumbed their nose at the SCOTUS decision regarding race based admissions. The center van no longer hold, to paraphrase Yeats.
Julie Kelly: Please see the Runnymede Report reply to Cara Wakefield and The Runnymede Report reply to Kevin Beck, particularly when it comes to willful deceit.
Well actually, Kevin, I believe you have seen this numerous times in this campaign to "get Donald Trump". As you say, Chutkan and Merchan but also Engoron and the opposition toward Aileen Cannon plus the posse of lawyers inclusive of James, Bragg, Willis, Wade and then add in the Secretaries of State across this nation that also mounted twin playbook gamesmanship with their single minded display of "let's see how we can sht down Trump's throat this time!" quarterbacking play action of a sort of famished dedication even to killing President Trump!
It has a junk yard dog attachment to the scrap of meat, at all costs, deliberate snap shot and sound bite Mount Rushmore sizing for all to see and feel with that bite of the rapier sword in our gut!
A. Jeanette: Please see The Runnymede Report reply to Kevin Beck.
This is a great quote from Kevin Beck. "Judge Chutkan approaches this case with an obvious bias against President Trump." And then, "It shows a complete lack of integrity and faithfulness to the law." Yes the judge is required to be neutral and not biased. And yes, it shows a complete lack of integrity and faithfulness to the law." However, there is a much bigger layer of dishonesty involved here. Integrity and faithfulness is the foundation of the entire practice of law of the prosecutors, the state bar associations and the judges who oversee both. The complete lack of integrity and faithfulness to the law as governed by the rules of professional conduct were tossed out the window in the New York DA Alvin Bragg prosecution of Trump.
The trial judge oversaw this corruption with the illicit help of the state bar association in New York. Here's how it was done as documented in a newsletter, published just four days ago.
It is entitled: This is the Professional Misconduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the
Record of New York DA Alvin Bragg. Part Four." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
In a way she did “..become a famous dancer.” She really has done some fancy foot work in her anti-American rulings.
Ugh why didn't I think of that! Good one!
You’re too busy doing the heavy lifting on these stories to be responsible for the comic relief. BTW, Beryl Howell finally sentenced me just in time to “keep me from participating in the election cycle”. She exceeded both the probation recommendations and the sentencing guideline recommendations, justifying the excessive sentence by stating I posed a “threat to democracy” and damaged America’s reputation on the world stage. Ben Bartee wrote a nice summary on PJ media: https://pjmedia.com/benbartee/2024/09/13/exclusive-nonviolent-j6-granny-slapped-with-bitter-sentence-n4932494
Thank you. What has happened to my husband and I is happening to people all over the country, from pro-life demonstrators to former President Trump. Thank God for people like Julie Kelley why continue to shine the light of truth on the situation. I don’t like what is happening to me but I am even more concerned about what is happening to the greatest nation ever conceived. I pray the turnout makes the election too big to rig.
It's so rotten that this is happening to you.
Like many of her colleagues, she covers her lack of intelligence with arrogance, haughtiness and smirking a la Kamala Harris. These people should not be near a courtroom.
Even one J6 corporate media reporter told me he was surprised by her behavior.
WvVet: Please see The Runnymede Report reply to Cara Wakefield and its reply to Kevin Beck.
It is imperative that a team of investigative journalists do a deep dive on this rogue judge. We need to know everything about her life, about her influences, about her corruption. As long as she plays at being rogue, tearing down our judicial system, we need to know everything. All her actions and her words now need to be made public, as well as her finances and her covert handlers. What hidden crimes exist in her background.
While I love your passion and direction, I think there's a simpler process.
Defund and shut down the entire DC circuit.
Make it clear that all affected personnel can only be rehired after proof that they were not complicit in the ludicrous injustice dished out under their administrations. And their rehire should be subject to 66% approval of J6 misdemeanor convicts.
All pending cases get moved to the jurisdiction of their residence.
This is exactly right. Shut down the DC federal courthouse, the DC US attorney's office, and the Washington FBI field office. The axis of evil.
This is an incredibly fantastic quote: "Shut down the DC federal courthouse, the DC US attorney's office, and the Washington FBI field office. The axis of evil."
There are layers upon layers of this axis of evil that are protected by the news media.
We can consider the state bar associations: They are viewed, through the lens of the news media, as "sacred cows." They are never subject to audit. They are never subject to review of any kind by anyone, especially the judiciary. The reality is the opposite of this perception. If they intentionally fail to prosecute offenders, such as in the Trump illicit prosecutions, they themselves are required to be disbarred. So, going back to Julie Kelly's comment: These offices also need to be "shut down." Then we can get back to restoring the republic the way it is supposed to be.
This is a great quote from Pete Healey: "Make it clear that all affected personnel can only be rehired after proof that they were not complicit in the ludicrous injustice dished out under their administrations." This is not a radical idea. But it goes much deeper. The entire legal profession is governed by rules of professional conduct. It too needs a complete overhaul. The rules say that any judge, any prosecutor, any state bar association, any lawyer, who has information brought to his or her attention that disbarment worthy professional misconduct is afoot is required to report it so it doesn't happen again (if they don't report they themselves are guilty of professional misconduct. And yet widespread misconduct is occurring through our prosecutors who remove fair trial rights of politically targeted defendants. Here is a newsletter, published in May, which documents how these rules work. It is entitled: "How the American Judiciary Became Utterly Dishonest." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/how-the-american-judiciary-became-8c2?r=3tdx2w Despite the clear requirements of the rules of professional misconduct this cabal went all out against Trump in the New York DA Alvin Bragg prosecution against Trump. Notice that the news media covered this up. So did the legal scholars and legal commentators. Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
Excellent work. Yes, the legal profession has tumbled down a steep slope into corruption. My experience taught me that the system, including major dispute resolution providers such as FINRA, has crumbled. (For example, I was shocked at the ease with which FINRA executives were willing to perjure themselves in a Federal Court in order to avoid responsibility for their actions. And they are supposed to be in charge of helping others resolve legal disputes!) My observation is that the "ethics" portions of classes in law schools focus on "what can I get away with" rather than instilling ethical character. Zealous advocacy (including pursuit of political goals) has become the jungle norm. I've worked with amazing judges, but also have now come to see the incompetence and bias of the bench at this time. It would seem we should require additional training before seating someone on the bench; perhaps we should require completion of an LLM focused on jurisprudence.
Yes. I suppose the most direct route would be impeachment hearings hosted by the House.
Taming the Wolf Institute: Please see The Runnymede Report reply to Pete Healey.
astounding judicial malpractice
This a great comment by david. In the traditional legal sense, malpractice can be either negligent, reckless or intentional. When it comes to the judiciary, they fall in the category of intentional malpractice. They know better and wilfully and intentionally assure that the corruption continues. One of the great deceptions is that are only governed by the judicial ethics rules which decidedly have no bite to them. What does have bite are the rules of professional conduct that govern all lawyers, prosecutors, state bar associations and judges.
If they intentionally break the rules they need to be prosecuted by means of disbarment from the practice of law. Here is a great breakdown illustrating this corruption in action all the way up to the Supreme Court. It is in a newsletter, published just four days ago. It is entitled: This is the Professional Misconduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the Record of New York
DA Alvin Bragg. Part Four." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
That "judge" is part of an evil cabal dedicated to destroying America. I hope when Mr. Trump wins, he cuts all aid to New York until the rotten state of corruption has been expunged from that debased state.
DC Goodman makes a great point about the rotten state of corruption in New York. Judge Merchan presided over a corrupt trial against Trump. But the corruption is much deeper than
suspected. The entire foundation of our legal system was overthrown in this prosecution,
not in the absurd legal theories brought by Bragg and accepted by Merchan, but rather the
overthrow of the defendant's right to be presumed innocent and his right to have a fair and impartial trial. DA Alvin Bragg office prosecuted the case through the New York Times and the publishing house of Simon and Schuster in a tell-all book against Trump. How corrupt was it?
It broke a central tenet of the rules of professional conduct. The prosecutor is forbidden from telling the public about the case outside of the judicial process. It's disbarment stuff. Yet, the entire judicial process starting with Judge Juan Merchan, extending up through the judicial chain and covered up the Grievance Committee of the Appellate Division of the New York Supreme Court perpetrated this gross abuse of the Fifth and the Sixth Amendment. What do the rules of professional conduct say? All involved must need be disbarred. Here is a newsletter, published just four days ago, that documents this travesty, which screams for massive removals. It is entitled "This is the Professional Misconduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the Record of New York DA Alvin Bragg. Part Four." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
I am, as so many Americans, sick and tired of the rabid and biased MSM, law-fare, Dems and DNC “ends justifying the means”, scheming by the intelligence community and outright imbalance of justice by the DOJ. How does this end? Is it only when Trump is no longer a target (no pun intended) or will Trump out of the picture only allow the machine do as it wants.
Dave Vierthaler: Please see The Runnymede Report reply to DC Goodman.
Hold on, I thought AG Garland just said the Justice System would not go after political opponents and weaponize the DOJ even though he is indirectly calling all the shots. These people need to be removed from office ASAP. One more of the many reasons we need Trump elected as POTUS!!
Wasn't that infuriating? What gall and arrogance. But what it signaled to me is Garland knows at least half the country does not trust the DOJ. Apparently he thinks if he says over and over that DOJ decisions are not political and everyone is treated equally, we will fall for his bunk. Not happening.
Well said Julie! My hatred for these people and the media cannot be measured. You and a few others like you are the only ones i truly believe, I can count them on one hand. I’m still shaking my head at the two despicable moderators from ABC, they truly destroyed their careers.
Is it that or is he threatening half of America?
Julie Kelly: Please see The Runnymede Report reply to DC Goodman.
War Eagle: "Removal from office?" Please see The Runnymede Report reply to DC Goodman.
I was just thinking the same thing! Can you imagine what SCOTUS would be if he had been voted in by Congress! He is void of any Justice or reasonable thinking. All he and his DOJ and FBI have done is go after Trump! He will go down in history as a joke!
Ironically, we have Mitch McConnell to thank for that. Mitch's finest hour in a career of lowlights.
As always excellent analysis from the BEST DAMNED REPORTER OUT THERE!
(Can't read this without wondering how the Ship will try to criticize it for irrelevant reasons, once again... Kinda pisses me off he's infiltrated my thought process when reading your excellent work!)
But one minor nit to pick, Julie... Your conclusion is shortsighted.
There will be no "additional scrutiny" this case is done, kaput, over yet...
This is Smith/Chutkan's play...
The case is only being held together by duct tape piano wire and paste for another few chances to allow Smith a chance to present unsubstantiated but damning evidence to be presented in her courtroom for the Presstitutes to use to further defame PDJT.
Come 11/5, no one will care anymore. Either the case gets dismissed under the new DOJ or the fraudulent winners no longer have a reason to pursue the case, they will have achieved their goal.
(Lest you doubt me, Ship's penultimate post did a great job of clarifying - without stating - this factoid)
If Harris wins, they will pursue this case. I wouldn't be surprised if Smith seeks another superseding indictment after the election to add more charges based on Trump's post-election conduct. My point is that the case ultimately dies not because a Harris DOJ will give up but because scrutiny by DC appellate court in Fischer and another SCOTUS review of existing elements in indictment won't hold.
Don't know what Shipley said about this...
This is a great point, Julie Kelly. While they focus on going after Trump's post-election "conduct" the lure is too great for no one to look at the professional conduct of the
judiciary, the state bar associations and the prosecutors. We need to get the word out.
These institutions will continue their "axis of evil" until a knowledgeable and informed citizenry sees the corruption and is willing to put the pressure on to demand the removals. It is deeper than anticipated. We have 197 accredited law schools across the country led by Lawyer Deans and Lawyer Law professors who foundationally teach the importance of the Constitution's guarantees of a fair trial for an accused. Yet when Trump's rights are destroyed in the DA Bragg prosecution they had nothing to say.
The logical question: then why are they employed?
Maybe I'm giving them more credit than they deserve, but I think even these fools know they have now chance on appeals and will drop it like a hot potato once they have run the election interference gambit for all it's worth.
(I'll keep you posted if the Ship chimes in, but I think he's finally figured out he's lost that match of wits.)
This is such a cluster F , unbelievable, but believable.
Well, she has achieved infamy. Probably not what she had in mind.
A genuine toad ok
A toad is easier on the eye.
Give Donald a fast but fair trial, then take him out back and hang him! Reminds one of England in the 1800's, the country that shipped hundreds of thousands of Scots and Irish to 'the colonies', for daring to live on their own land.
Forget the trial. Just hang him.
Joseph Kaplan: Please see the Runnymede Report reply to desmond oneill.
This is a great point made by desmond oneill in bringing things back to England. It is widely known that the apex of western civilization is the Magna Carta. At the center of it is the doctrine of due process. The U.S. thought it was important enough to incorporate its tenets in the Fifth and Sixth Amendments of the U.S. Constitution. That's called fair trial rights. So our prosecutors, judges and state bar associations have pushed the doctrine out of the way to fulfill political objectives. Worse, the news media has, through smoke and mirrors, convinced the American people that these rights don't even exist. Proof: Here is a newsletter, published four days ago, that documents this. It is entitled: "This is the Professional Misconduct that the Supreme Court Buried. It is the record of DA Alvin Bragg. Part Four." Here is the link: https://therunnymedereport.substack.com/p/this-is-the-professional-misconduct-4e2?r=3tdx2w
Sincere question: why are foreigners like Chutkan and Merchan allowed to be U.S. judges?
As usual Julie, such a great article!
As a teacher of students with a myriad of ability levels (multiple disabilities, normal, autism, syndromes galore) I am pretty versed in recognizing someone who just wants reinforcement (negative or positive doesn't matter with them) because they just want any kind of attention. And I see that in Chutkan, through your experience of her. And now I also see just a bit of a sister-hood with Kamala Harris in the Jamaica connection. And then there's that proliferative arrogance that perspirates from every pore of her skin. And that too was evident from the constantly lying and perceived psychological baiting performance from that inimitable sister, Kamala, at the recent debate. Whell actually it was a deliberate set up "GOTCHA" interview of 3 on 1, a couple of days ago of harris, linsey and muir against Donald J. Trump!
It's pretty obvious that ALL of the players for Kamala and the conglomerate Demo crowd of deception machine tactical maneuver opposition are spewing the same game plan, albeit with inclement lies a plenty! And THAT SCRIPT has been employed for an inordinately long number of beyond 10 years.
I must say, the Deep State's deep state playbook is not only maddening but the level of depravity it produces takes similar twists and turns but also increasingly uglier presentations that bring deeper disgust that convinces me to not even begin to change my mind of total negativity toward the opposition. And I don't believe that I will ever offer a sliver of positive feeling for "them" anymore!