53 Comments
User's avatar
War Eagle's avatar

If anyone deserves to be in prison it is Brennan. Maybe one day justice will prevail and Brennan will finally be held accountable to all his crimes and law fare against President Trump. We can only hope this will come to fruition.

Julie Kelly's avatar

Brennan is up there with my personal worst-of-the-worst list. It looks like the false statements case is a no brainer. Will be interesting to see how that fits in to the bigger conspiracy and who he'll rat out in the process.

War Eagle's avatar

I concur, he is a snake.

Adam Pruzan's avatar

Not prison. Hanging. With vultures eating his rotting flesh.

Adam Pruzan's avatar

Clarification: I wrote that because you used the word “deserves.” Sadly, in terms of US law, all he can get is prison.

Kevin Beck's avatar

And before everyone that wants to celebrate the event is able to remember the reason for the execrable Brennan going to prison.

Mary Sholl's avatar

Times wasting guys. I know it is not easy putting a case together but we’re going to run out of time so get it on. Please.

Julie Kelly's avatar

It's very hard to put all the pieces in place to secure an indictment. Not only does the team need to collect evidence, lots of back and forth with lawyers to provide documents and testimony. Since many are former government employees, I assume plenty of fights about privilege and classified materials. And unfortunately we went through one AG in the process. I understand the need for urgency but also for deliberation if they want to get this right.

Dawn Pegis's avatar

Thank you, Julie. I was pleased w/DeGenova’s assignment. I would be for the PATIENT and THOROUGH approach!!! Dear Lord, don’t let it get mucked up with political rushiness or worse, carelessness!!

Julie Kelly's avatar

Exactly, Dawn, we've already seen a few cases implode over perceived hastiness. So Blanche and Quinones now want to proceed deliberately but also on an even pace. Definitely appears we are in the quickening stage now.

Don Reed's avatar

09/14/26: DeG's deflated posture in the photo said it all at the very beginning: "This isn't going to work out." Ands it didn't. Because there can only be ONE leader. And that is Blanche, period. RESULTS, PLEASE.

Julie Kelly's avatar

It's very easy to see those two butting heads, Don!

Don Reed's avatar

DeG: "Ouch! That hurt. I quit."

Joseph Kaplan's avatar

I know nothing about these things but my guess is his ego was not being sufficiently stroked

Don Reed's avatar

09/14/26: I am equally remote from insider info but suspect that just plain old bad chemistry ended DiG's enthusiasm. That and I never liked the idea of an 81 year-old anybody getting involved in work that can drain the energy and enthusiasm of someone fifty years younger.

Evil Incarnate's avatar

Trump is sometimes his own worst enemy. There is no one in his inner circle who can tell him things he doesn’t want to hear.

I don’t know what happened here. I’m just piecing together past patterns.

I can easily imagine Trump bitching and moaning that DiGenova isn’t moving rapidly enough. No one close to him is going to push back because they know they’ll hear the words “you’re fired. “

A year was lost while Pam Bondi went through the motions of being Attorney General. I’d love to know if Trump ever asks himself who persuaded him to appoint that blonde bimbo.

At this point, time is not the friend of those of us who want to see people go to jail for their crimes.

Julie Kelly's avatar

I agree that Bondi was not the right choice and that resulted in lost time the DOJ could not afford. I'm not sure how involved Trump was in pushing things in Florida, prompting diGenova's departure but I would be mildly surprised given this was Trump's idea. But who knows...and yes time is ticking.

Brent Buckley's avatar

diGenova's resignation (along with his wife's resignation) is not particular alarming. What is alarming is his comment:

"If you want indictments where there’s no evidence, you have an ethical problem”—

This comment can only be interpreted to mean the he is saying that there is not sufficient evidence of the guilt of the perpetrators of the crime but the prosecution team is proceeding toward indictment anyway.. Mr. di Genova's statement is patently absurd on its face. Massive amounts of evidence in the form of memos, Emails, test messages, phone conversations and witness statements are already on the record and in the public domain. More than half dozen fully foot-noted books have been published detailing this evidence. So, what is going on?

My guess (and it's only an informed guess) is that operatives in the Democrat Party political machine have somehow pressured or threatened or blackmailed the de Genova's into abandoning the prosecution team and making that ridiculous statement. We all know that extremely powerful well-organized forces(e.g., CIA) have been at work for 12 years trying to bring down Trump and his pro-American policy making.

The objective and circumstantial evidence against Brennan, Strozk, Paige, Comey, Clinton and the others is considerable. When this evidence is placed before an honest rule-of-law jury, it would most likely result in conviction for all the participants. That we are continuing to see key players in the effort to investigate prosecute the guilty mysteriously resign, recant, or die is frightening. Everyone involved is awaiting the November election results because those results will determine whether the guilty will be held accountable or whether they go free and the country devolves further into corruption, chaos and criminality.

Julie Kelly's avatar

I'd be shocked, Brent, if they were threatened in any way. They've had plenty of battles with the feds and they don't appear like the type to back down. My guess is we will hear more details in the weeks to come...and yes, we know plenty of evidence exists of their individual crimes and malfeasance but piecing it together to develop a conspiracy case that includes over acts that fit into the SOL window AND is convincing enough to bring to a grand jury is no easy feat.

Brent Buckley's avatar

Hi Julie,

I agree that it is unlikely that the diGenova's were intimidated into backing down. They are tough as nails. However, it is, I think, somewhat plausible. Among thee factors that I count as giving plausibility to blackmail is: 1) That the both resigned at the same time; 2) the suddenness of the resignations and; 3) tJoe's inexplicable statement inferring that the prosecutions are being pursued without sufficient evidence and are motivated by vendetta. Also, I have come to believe that the Democrat Party political machine (including the Democrat Socialist of America wing) has in it some operatives who do not hesitate to intimidate, black mail, and utterly destroy anyone that opposes them. Keep up the publications and posts. You have great intuition and are a sound level-headed thinker. We need you.

Ginger Li's avatar

DiGenova might be making a deal to preserve their employment prospects with the other side. Those swamp creatures have no more morals than a rattlesnake. And it's always, let the country be damned, I come first. You can tell by the fact that his wife is a swamp creature as well i.e. marriage of convenience, and they're both leaving together.

Richard Luthmann's avatar

Two investigations, a prosecutor’s resignation, and a records-preservation fight now overlap. Brennan’s lawyer describes a broader Florida conspiracy inquiry alongside a narrower investigation into his congressional statements. His legal team seeks preservation of government records that could support a future claim of selective or vindictive prosecution. DOJ opposes the request as speculative because Brennan has not been charged yet. Joe DiGenova’s departure adds a dispute over management and prosecutorial judgment. Brennan needs to face the music.

Julie Kelly's avatar

Well put, Richard! And looks like he will!

sandy picard's avatar

Thanks for the update Julie . That was a cryptic teaser of a post and all I got out of that was diGenova was pouting that he didn't get his way. Hoping for positive news soon

Julie Kelly's avatar

It's unfortunate because, as I said, it initially gave fuel to the accusation that Trump and Blanche are rushing political cases. That was not a smart comment and diGenova has since walked it back a bit. I don't know for sure he was pouting or just had had enough but either way, not the sort of exit that helps anyone here.

Pete Healey's avatar

I hope you're right, but I continue to believe that Blanche was a horrible choice and this throws gas on my expectations that once confirmed he'd resume being the blocker in chief he was under Bondi. You got me to back off, as I respect your contrary expectations. Prove me wrong again, please.

Julie Kelly's avatar

I will try, Pete! I think Blanche is picking up the pieces from Bondi, prioritizing resources at DOJ, tamping down this nonstop assault on Trump's DOJ, and moving political cases along. Give it a little more time :)

KimboThisIsMyCountry2's avatar

I have no idea why people think Blanche is such a bad choice. Everything I have seen out of him has been impeccable! He is getting a lot more done than Bondi that is for sure. DeG is Just an old man with a chip on his shoulder! Thank you Julie this was very informative.

Wayne Pearson's avatar

I hope this was all just ego driven by all concerned. Too many chefs in the kitchen spoil the broth.

Julie Kelly's avatar

As is usually the case, Wayne!

Pat Smith's avatar

The DOJ needs to stay after this guy. He is the personification of the arrogant, contemptable and most importantly, unaccountable deep state.

Julie Kelly's avatar

Agreed, Pat!

Roy V's avatar

DOJ...... get on with it!

Carolyn's avatar

We will see how this goes...Trust GOD. We are in a time of revelation. People and things are being exposed for who and what they really are. GOD is fulfilling HIS promises of exposing things done in the dark to the light which is truth. Let HIM do HIS works.

Cara Wakefield's avatar

Disappointing but it could come down to just interpersonal conflicts. Perhaps nothing more than DiGenova with a "don't push me, kid" attitude toward Blanche. I don't care, long as they get their man in the end.

Julie Kelly's avatar

I can easily envision exactly that sort of friction, Cara. I think diGenova walked into somewhat of a mess and tried his best but apparently the disputes between him and Blanche were too much in the end. Plus, he's 81, who needs this job anyway :)

Kevin Beck's avatar

This appears as another step in the extend-and-pretend phase of this investigation. I guess it's going to extend until almost every relevant witness is unable to recall anything related to the facts of the case.

Julie Kelly's avatar

I hope you're wrong, Kevin (with all due respect lol)

Jon S's avatar

I am not optimistic any form of justice (outside of social justice) can ever be carried out in this country.....