81 Comments

Thanks Julie. This makes it so abundantly clear what kind of corruption we're dealing with. There is a clear bright line from 2016 to now, how mass hysteria filled the gaps to invent 'intent' based on their own delusions. Do you think SCOTUS will agree that they "abused the statute to criminalize political dissent"? Is intent the only thing that they believe distinguishes these cases from all the ways the Left have deliberately disrupted official proceedings to protest? How disgusting our government has become.

Expand full comment
Dec 16, 2023Liked by Julie Kelly

It’s time to end the judicial complicity AND judicial cowardice.

Expand full comment
Dec 16, 2023Liked by Julie Kelly

A ray of hope finally! Julie, you deserve at least this much for how long you have been trying to elevate this issue. Hopefully, the federal prosecutors are rattled enough to stop seeking new arrests after 3 years of abuse. Although, I do wish a peaceful holiday season for all, I’m hoping all souls (prosecutors, politicians, judges, federal agents etc...) who have been participating in this outrageous injustice of their fellow American citizens sleep restlessly throughout. You are the best Julie.

Expand full comment

What about Ray Epps and the “unequal” application of the law?

What about the destruction of Hillary’s emails, files, and cell phones, and the “unequal” application of the law?

Expand full comment

I'm not a lawyer, but these prosecutions really seem to violate the equal protection clause of the Constitution, (as others have said). The prosecutors are completely unconcerned with official proceedings repeatedly disrupted by the Left. But if a Trump supporter peacefully protests, watch out, now it's a huge Federal crime. Total crap. Swamp needs draining bad.

Expand full comment
Dec 16, 2023Liked by Julie Kelly

“And federal judges in Washington who willfully endorsed such intentional prosecutorial abuse will suffer a collective black eye, justifying calls for mass resignations and retirements.”

Not true. Our ruling class, their media, Academia, Hollywood, Big Tech and many in the general public strongly support these Woke “social justice” judges and consider white, working class, Trump supporters “a clear and present danger” which must be dealt with just the way these judges are doing.

We lack a common reality, have become incomprehensible to each other and can no longer communicate. Where is the common ground in such an infinitely wide divide? There obviously is none. We always just talk past each other. This can only get worse and is getting worse by the day. The same people who insist Jan 6 was an “Insurrection!” have no problem with Joe’s open southern border or his campaign to replace meritocracy wherever it can be found with Equity aka Equal Outcomes. This is just not working at all. Could it be that the reason why America is so rapidly unraveling externally is because it no longer exists as a country internally?

Expand full comment
Dec 16, 2023·edited Dec 16, 2023

If the Supreme Court were in the business of dispensing justice, it should be a slam dunk the misapplication of this statute is overturned.

Unfortunately, Chief Justice Roberts has a lot of influence with the other justices, and he is consumed with the reputation of the court. What that really means is, he is worried about the New York Times and the rest of State Media saying mean things about his court.

A side note- some of his oddball written opinions lead me to wonder, what dirt does the Deep State have on him?

I estimate it as 50/50 The Supremes will do the right thing.

Expand full comment

Here we will see if the Roberts court is one of real constitutional justice or just another puppet institution of the ruling class establishment. Of course this obstruction statute has been abused for political purposes. But will the majority fold under the prospect of giving Trump this win? We have seen them fold before.

Expand full comment

The judiciary used to be comprised principled judges, both liberal and conservative, whose interpretations of the law differed at the margins, all of whom would throw creative, untried theories of the law like these 1512 prosecutions out of court as travesties in an instant.

Now, though, outcome determinative leftist judges continue percolating up through the ranks, a product of the DEI/ Marxist "long march" through the educational institutions, and they are slowly starting to outnumber traditional jurists.

So, the Supreme Court may save us this time. but our days of counting on the courts to save us from the deprivations of the Left are numbered.

Expand full comment
Dec 16, 2023Liked by Julie Kelly

What a massive miscarriage of justice. And it should result in a blood letting of the DOJ and FBI and the Biden/Obama regime's bent to "pounce" and bite clean through all of the innocents of the J6 situation.

It was beyond stupid and rude to call Jan. 6th an insurrection. But, it sure is appropriate to call the reaction from the Dem/Lib/left/Prog Army of Ass biters a total eclipse of logic, common sense and rational reasonability not to mention a library of lies. And when this clearing of just plain stupid by the typical D/L/L/P DOJ, FBI, CIA and FULL complement of Biden/Obama's regime of dirty crusty rectums get handed their already bitten into lunch, you know what they will do, don't you?!?

That faction of jerkwadds will ignore it, walk away, turn their head and give a sniping look. And then as they turn back to the way they are walking, just before they hit that pole right in front of them, they will vow to get us the next time! And that's all while Hunter Biden is resting his lopsided head on a jail or prison pillow, Jim Biden is in those moments being prosecuted and "the Big Guy" is somewhere off with fake Dr. Jill scurrying away from their illegitimate granddaughter that Hunter (and the rest of the fambly) worked so hard to openly not recognize.

After all, it was Hunter's addictions that ralphed all over Joe Biden's scheme to cash in on the American Tax Payer's and every possible dictatorial government's bank accounts for his fambly's personal gain. So DAMN that "smartest person Joe knows" Hunter Biden. And thanks for the the GIFT, Hunter, for giving the world your come to Geezus laptop.

Uh Joe, where's your Richard Nixon speech?

Expand full comment
Dec 16, 2023Liked by Julie Kelly

If the Supreme Court slows the abusive use of this obstruction statute to stand, it will outlaw politics and political protests, which seek to influence official proceedings. For example, it should apply to Maxine Waters threatening the Derek Chauvin jury. However, what it would really accomplish would be to institutionalize lawfare against Trump supporters and, more broadly, anyone opposed to the woke social justice agenda. Like Michael Sussman and Igor Danchenko, leftists who commit actual crimes, let alone obstruction, are given a free pass. If the Supreme Court upholds these abusive prosecutions, free political expression on the right will be finished.

Expand full comment
Dec 19, 2023Liked by Julie Kelly

4 felonies a day. Don't stand up too tall or the government will strike you down. Nobody except this Presidents son is safe.

Expand full comment

A thread you might be interested in Julie. Thx for honoring our service.

https://twitter.com/FreeStateWill/status/1735739825783755184/photo/1

Expand full comment
Dec 17, 2023Liked by Julie Kelly

I hope and pray SCOTUS realizes We are teetering on the brink. Is it really going to take that long?

Expand full comment
Dec 16, 2023Liked by Julie Kelly

Maybe, just maybe the SCOTUS sees the writing on the wall, that if this miscarriage of justice continues & isn’t reigned in, the damage & potential violence that could result from a Trump conviction. They may see a need to stop the circus. I do believe that there are many in the government & its agencies that want to see the violence & chaos, but I don’t believe the Justices do.

Expand full comment

The problem is that the Federal court in DC is corrupt. Most of them are Obama appointees. Chutkin isn't even American, she's Jamaican. She came to the US as an adult and decided to go to law school. She doesn't understand the US Constitution. She and Howell have both made political statements showing they are political partisans. Elsie Stefanik just filed ethics charges against Howell. The DOJ and unscrupulous lawyers file charges in DC knowing the predominantly black Democrats who make up the jury pool will rule against anyone who is not a Democrat.

I'm doing a lot of reading now about the period before, during and after the War Between the States and I'm seeing a lot of parallels with the Democrats of today and the Radical Republicans of that day. Somewhere around the 1930s the two parties swapped sides.

PS - My wife and you share an alma mater. I think you were a year or two behind her.

Expand full comment