Guest column by criminal defense attorney David W. Fischer details all the flaws in Alvin Bragg's case against Donald Trump and offers one argument Trump's attorneys might be overlooking.
My thought precisely. Whoever is responsible for drafting the counts in the indictment is not possessed of attorney Fischer’s intellect. Question: is the black- robed Merchan of adequate intellect to comprehend Mr. Fischer’s legal analysis. I doubt it.
In accounting 101 we teach that the owner's affairs have to be kept separate from the owner's sole proprietor or partnership or corporate business activities. I believe that what Mr. Fischer is saying is that Trump paid Cohen out of his personal funds not the Trump Organization funds. He can't go get a haircut and charge it to his business accounts. The crime charged is that the records of the Trump Organization were changed by his payment, but he paid for that expense out of his personal account. Thus the charge is not valid.
I read it differently. Fischer says the intermingling of records beteeen Trump and his company is irrelevant. The case for Trump is that the Cohen invoice and Trump checks by themselves do not constitute false entries in business ledgers, which the statute requires. The checks, invoices etc were simply stored with Trump Organization records, which is not a violation of the statute. Trump or his people would have had to do something more than just store those items; they would have had to actively make false entries in Trump’s ledgers or records, which never happened!
Brilliant work by Mr. Fischer. Trump’s lawyers should move at the earliest possible date to have the case dismissed based on Fischer’s analysis.
Thank you, Mr Fischer and Julie, for bringing this to our attention. I think it is a brilliant analysis and should form the basis for a motion for summary judgment after Bragg has finished with his witnesses. As was evident in Colangelo’s opening today which included the most salacious part from the Access Hollywood tape — something that is 100% irrelevant in this case, given no allegation of unwanted sex — Bragg seems so intent on smearing Trump that he sabotaged his own indictment with charges that aren’t crimes under the laws his case relies on. He screwed up big time and it should be difficult for Merchan to get out of having to dismiss the case based on a plain reading of the statute.
In order for the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy to finally achieve their centuries old goal of a One-World Global Empire they must first accomplish two prerequisite goals:
1. The “Great Collapse of Society” using the methods propounded by the Frankfurt School.
2. The abolition of the US Constitution that legitimizes the USA as an independent sovereign nation-state, and that guarantees and protects citizen’s personal liberty, personal rights, and personal property ownership.
The only thing standing in the way of the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy achieving their goal of a NWO One-World Global Empire is the US Constitution that legitimizes the USA as an independent sovereign nation-state, and guarantees and protects each citizen’s personal liberty, personal rights, and personal property ownership. Donald Trump is the leader and standard bearer of the “America First MAGA Patriots” movement that holds the US Constitution in its fist and waves it in the faces of the Deep State RINO Establishment and the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy. This is why the Globalists have declared Donald Trump as their Enemy No. 1 who must be destroyed in any manner possible, legal or not, at all costs. Enemy No. 2 is anyone who supports Trump.
The Great Collapse of Society
The Frankfurt School and “Critical Theory”
The Frankfurt School, or Institute for Social Research, was set up by a group of Marxist intellectuals in Germany in 1923, affiliated to the University of Frankfurt and independently of the Communist Party, which has been influential in the development of Marxist theory ever since.
The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.
To further advance their ‘quiet’ incremental cultural revolution (Fabian Socialism) – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):
Divide and Conquer.
The oppressed and their oppressors.
1. The creation of racism offenses.
2. Continual change to create confusion.
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking/drug abuse.
7. Emptying of churches.
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media.
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pan-sexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors.’
Cloward and Piven in 1966 included much of what you've said in their theories. One of their big pushes was for uncontrolled borders that would lead to a welfare state that would collapse under its own weight. Add to that Sol Alinsky's rules for radicals, take a look around you and it's apparent that we are off to the races. You have to give the collectivists credit; they are very patient. The road to collectivism in our country is well over 100 years long and longer.
I read this a second time and it is very clear. Without producing the entry that was falsely entered, there is no proof beyond a reasonable doubt: the State has not met its burden of proof. This is not a case for a jury.
Dems know this indictment and trial are election interference (in the same way Bill Maher is ok with abortion being murder) Dems are ok with it. That it will eventually the inevitable conviction will be thrown out is of no consequence.
Huh? The crime is making a false entry in the company's records. The documents that contain the false information were made by Cohen, NOT Trump, and they are not Trump Organization records. That's about as simple as it gets. But you're probably 10 times smarter than the average NY juror. So if you don't get it after having the opportunity to read the article, Trump is in deep trouble.
If the jurors are honest people and they can’t follow the highly technical and esoteric case Bragg is making, then clearly Bragg has not proven his case beyond a reasonable doubt, and the jury must acquit.
Your article was spot on and well done. It explains what and why this is happening but not the solution to this very immediate and vexing problem.
What we all now see is like a rash that is starting to pop up and become evident ubiquitously throughout the body politic that should be as obvious and terrifying as an outbreak of small pox in an elementary school. We are all concerned as to what can be done. Great efforts are being made to prevent Trump from regaining the Presidency, because he will make Snowden, and every other whistle blower, resonate like Gunga Din did to Kipling. The truths will come out and further resonate like Encounters of the Third Kind or the Second Coming of Christ. However, the immediate issue is to get this filthy biting horsefly of a distraction off of Trump's back so he can campaign. This mockery of a trial is about getting a bogus felony conviction which is no different than a bogus felony murder or rape conviction if it does the job it was designed to do... interfere with the election day outcome. What difference will it make if it is overturned on Jan 6 2025? By then fascism 101 becomes fascism 202 and finally communism 303 in 2026 with Kamala Harris, as President, taking lesions from Kim Yo Jong, the sister of Kim Jong Un, on how to destroy America.
Possibly the best thing Trump can do is to not show up for trial and refuse to partake in the Kabuki theater drama spectacle produced by the NYC based "Lawfare Criminal Enterprise Company". The fanfare will be great but nowhere near as great as will be the Biblical fanfare associated with the bogus felony conviction that is sure to happen months from now just before the mail-in ballots go out in swing states.
What does the law have to do with this case? They just throw garbage at the wall and Merchan makes it stick. He has already written his instructions to the jury. "Even though you have already arrived at you verdict, go into that room and don't come out for at least 30 minutes. We must keep up appearances."
While this "another defense" is accurate, the fundamental argument that these are not "business records" has to be put front and center by defense counsel. The "the" and "entry" arguments are too technical.
For cryin out loud these are personal checks of DJT and payees/amounts in his own checkbook.
I presume corrupt-beyond-belief Judge Merchan's ruling must be adopting Bragg's intertwined argument which is a complete crock. As another commenter noted, business and personal accounts of shareholders must be kept separate. DJT cannot defraud or deceive himself in his own personal records.
There should be one witness on this for maybe 30 mins, exhibits of the personal checks filed with the court, a stipulation that the indictment is a correct statement of the facts that these were checks and records of DJY, and a 10 minute jury summation at most hitting this only. Anything more will give the Dem-media lots of ink to spill on other stuff and obfiscate, when this is all that matters. Publicity that this is all the defense presented will drive the point home, that any sane person can understand. A complex defense will not change the verdict, so the defense and follow on messaging needs to be short and sweet.
Motions argued with the judge and no doubt jury instructions that misinterpret the law will be completely adequate for an appeal which will overturn the verdict (after the election).
This case should never get to the jury. After Bragg finishes with his witnesses, Trump’s lawyer should move for summary judgment on the grounds that Bragg never introduced evidence that Trump’s people falsified any entries; the statute is not aimed at simply filing possibly incorrect papers with your records. You must do something more: you must actively falssify your ledgers by making false entries , which Bragg has never suggested Trump did.
If the judge is not a complete crook, he has to grant summary judgement for Trump and the case never gets to the jury.
Standard motion. Called a directed verdict in a criminal trial. Judge Merchan will never grant it in a million years or he could not live the rest of his life amongst his bubble (or with his daughter).
You could be correct. Would a complex defense argument be way over the heads of these jurors? How much confidence can be placed in this jury anyway to put their brains to it? Somehow, I think that feelings, emotions, and hatred are going to rule the day.
How is it that you can make a payment thru your lawyer to settle a legal matter and it is not a legal expense? The nature of the legal matter being settled is irrelevant. It's a legal matter settled by a legal agreement using a legal vehicle.ie the non-discloser agreement memorialized in legal documents and signed by consulting adults under the supervision of legal counsel. That strikes me as a lot of legal stuff for it not to be a legal expense. A rather large legal expense....
Big Picture: the argument is like which teams member hit JFK. The frontal bullet hole in the windshield proves 2 shooters at least, thus a conspiracy, making the questions who was aware of it and abetted it? The list is pretty long and starts at the tippy top.
Same thing here. Shooters in Atlanta, DC, FLA, and NYC. Plainly manifest federal constitutional due process violations ongoing, including sham indictment, conflicts requiring recusal as a matter of law, insufficient evidence proferred to establish essentials element(s), manifestly unconstitutional gag order, and a schedule and voir dire intended to select a jury most inclined to convict.
But again, it doesn't really matter that James Files has sworn he rested his short fireball rifle on the picket fence for the fatal head shot any shooter could have made. The bullet to the throat was a frontal wound the Parklant doctors have maintained. Greer was the obvious failsafe, and he did slam the limo stopped for a few seconds. Did he turn around like Oddjob in Goldfinger, and deliver one of the shots? (It would explain Jackie crawling out and maybe saving her life.)
Please excuse the digression, but I just kindled the book of a Santa Clara U emeritus professor who has painstakingly reviewd the JFK files released under Trump. Nothing earth shattering. But we can guess what these files wd say (if they ever saw the light of day upon creation).
A LOT of citizens were OK with JFK getting whacked, from the tippee top on down. That's why they swallowed the blue pill of the Warren report like gullible fish. It just seems safer, and it demonstrably is.
In NYC they're down to their last shooter. They're all being controlled by POTUS regime. They have disregarded regular order for political gain. If successful, SCOTUS likely will be raised to 11 or 13, or 21, come on let's roll the dice.
Imho 6 at least of current 9 favor 9 max. That means ANY petition to SCOTUS in first instance that provides arguable grounds to STAY, or STAY and TRANFER, will RESTORE REGULAR ORDER. The cretins will say lawfare is the status quo, but most certainly will fail.
FAILING to restore Regular presidential election order will tip the scales to the incumbent, and would crash Roberts's legacy, whatever else it is. If he's bright enough, it could be another
9-0.
The question of regular presidential election order is one peculiarly within purview of SCOTUS. Where is the Pacific Legal Foundation on this, or better, Heritage Action Group. Help save the country. Engage for DJT immediate cert (and habeas since restricted by govt) and earn a stay to return to regular order. The person/ group who undertake this patriotic endeavor will be conducting themselves unassailably. Opportunities to be heroes don't often come along - especially when it comes to halting an un-American travesty Euro show trial. We are better than that. SCOTUS is uniquely situated to act NOW. Why wait? The damages are accruing and multiplying.
Their final marksman is a clod of a lawyer at DOJ (and thus a direct agent of Biden- more proof of conspiracy) who can be HALTED with a MINIMUM of effort. Thus,
we are better positioned than those on Elm Street to stop this show motion hit job.
You are an important cog. Keep going for it, and aim high.
One final note. Since conclusive physical proof exists of two or more shooters, the entire Warren Report is based on a fatal factual inaccuracy and thus should be renamed "The official USG conspiracy theory on JFK murder." All Oswald-only theorists are the real cranks.
I doubt Bragg came up with these indictments. The WH wrote these for him to execute. This attorney's explanation is probably over Braggs head.
My thought precisely. Whoever is responsible for drafting the counts in the indictment is not possessed of attorney Fischer’s intellect. Question: is the black- robed Merchan of adequate intellect to comprehend Mr. Fischer’s legal analysis. I doubt it.
I doubt it maters.
Hope you can get this to the Trump Team, Julie.
In accounting 101 we teach that the owner's affairs have to be kept separate from the owner's sole proprietor or partnership or corporate business activities. I believe that what Mr. Fischer is saying is that Trump paid Cohen out of his personal funds not the Trump Organization funds. He can't go get a haircut and charge it to his business accounts. The crime charged is that the records of the Trump Organization were changed by his payment, but he paid for that expense out of his personal account. Thus the charge is not valid.
I read it differently. Fischer says the intermingling of records beteeen Trump and his company is irrelevant. The case for Trump is that the Cohen invoice and Trump checks by themselves do not constitute false entries in business ledgers, which the statute requires. The checks, invoices etc were simply stored with Trump Organization records, which is not a violation of the statute. Trump or his people would have had to do something more than just store those items; they would have had to actively make false entries in Trump’s ledgers or records, which never happened!
Brilliant work by Mr. Fischer. Trump’s lawyers should move at the earliest possible date to have the case dismissed based on Fischer’s analysis.
Do you think they will reach this analysis on their own?
Thank you, Mr Fischer and Julie, for bringing this to our attention. I think it is a brilliant analysis and should form the basis for a motion for summary judgment after Bragg has finished with his witnesses. As was evident in Colangelo’s opening today which included the most salacious part from the Access Hollywood tape — something that is 100% irrelevant in this case, given no allegation of unwanted sex — Bragg seems so intent on smearing Trump that he sabotaged his own indictment with charges that aren’t crimes under the laws his case relies on. He screwed up big time and it should be difficult for Merchan to get out of having to dismiss the case based on a plain reading of the statute.
A WARNING TO AMERICA: 25 WAYS THE US IS BEING DESTROYED | EXPLAINED IN UNDER 2 MINUTES
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Hsaarv2FGdGT/
In order for the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy to finally achieve their centuries old goal of a One-World Global Empire they must first accomplish two prerequisite goals:
1. The “Great Collapse of Society” using the methods propounded by the Frankfurt School.
2. The abolition of the US Constitution that legitimizes the USA as an independent sovereign nation-state, and that guarantees and protects citizen’s personal liberty, personal rights, and personal property ownership.
The only thing standing in the way of the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy achieving their goal of a NWO One-World Global Empire is the US Constitution that legitimizes the USA as an independent sovereign nation-state, and guarantees and protects each citizen’s personal liberty, personal rights, and personal property ownership. Donald Trump is the leader and standard bearer of the “America First MAGA Patriots” movement that holds the US Constitution in its fist and waves it in the faces of the Deep State RINO Establishment and the Globalist Fascist Oligarchy. This is why the Globalists have declared Donald Trump as their Enemy No. 1 who must be destroyed in any manner possible, legal or not, at all costs. Enemy No. 2 is anyone who supports Trump.
The Great Collapse of Society
The Frankfurt School and “Critical Theory”
The Frankfurt School, or Institute for Social Research, was set up by a group of Marxist intellectuals in Germany in 1923, affiliated to the University of Frankfurt and independently of the Communist Party, which has been influential in the development of Marxist theory ever since.
The Frankfurt School believed that as long as an individual had the belief – or even the hope of belief – that his divine gift of reason could solve the problems facing society, then that society would never reach the state of hopelessness and alienation that they considered necessary to provoke socialist revolution. Their task, therefore, was as swiftly as possible to undermine the Judeo-Christian legacy. To do this they called for the most negative destructive criticism possible of every sphere of life which would be designed to de-stabilize society and bring down what they saw as the ‘oppressive’ order. Their policies, they hoped, would spread like a virus—‘continuing the work of the Western Marxists by other means’ as one of their members noted.
To further advance their ‘quiet’ incremental cultural revolution (Fabian Socialism) – but giving us no ideas about their plans for the future – the School recommended (among other things):
Divide and Conquer.
The oppressed and their oppressors.
1. The creation of racism offenses.
2. Continual change to create confusion.
3. The teaching of sex and homosexuality to children.
4. The undermining of schools’ and teachers’ authority.
5. Huge immigration to destroy identity.
6. The promotion of excessive drinking/drug abuse.
7. Emptying of churches.
8. An unreliable legal system with bias against victims of crime.
9. Dependency on the state or state benefits.
10. Control and dumbing down of media.
11. Encouraging the breakdown of the family.
One of the main ideas of the Frankfurt School was to exploit Freud’s idea of ‘pan-sexualism’ – the search for pleasure, the exploitation of the differences between the sexes, the overthrowing of traditional relationships between men and women. To further their aims they would:
• attack the authority of the father, deny the specific roles of father and mother, and wrest away from families their rights as primary educators of their children.
• abolish differences in the education of boys and girls
• abolish all forms of male dominance – hence the presence of women in the armed forces
• declare women to be an ‘oppressed class’ and men as ‘oppressors.’
https://open.substack.com/pub/william3n4z2/p/who-are-the-globalist-fascist-oligarchy?r=1kb28q&utm_campaign=post&utm_medium=web
https://www.bitchute.com/video/Hsaarv2FGdGT/
Cloward and Piven in 1966 included much of what you've said in their theories. One of their big pushes was for uncontrolled borders that would lead to a welfare state that would collapse under its own weight. Add to that Sol Alinsky's rules for radicals, take a look around you and it's apparent that we are off to the races. You have to give the collectivists credit; they are very patient. The road to collectivism in our country is well over 100 years long and longer.
I read this a second time and it is very clear. Without producing the entry that was falsely entered, there is no proof beyond a reasonable doubt: the State has not met its burden of proof. This is not a case for a jury.
It's not a case at all.
Dems know this indictment and trial are election interference (in the same way Bill Maher is ok with abortion being murder) Dems are ok with it. That it will eventually the inevitable conviction will be thrown out is of no consequence.
Not a lawyer , I don’t understand this defense.
Too complicated, although it might be that the indictment is too complicated.
Huh? The crime is making a false entry in the company's records. The documents that contain the false information were made by Cohen, NOT Trump, and they are not Trump Organization records. That's about as simple as it gets. But you're probably 10 times smarter than the average NY juror. So if you don't get it after having the opportunity to read the article, Trump is in deep trouble.
If the jurors are honest people and they can’t follow the highly technical and esoteric case Bragg is making, then clearly Bragg has not proven his case beyond a reasonable doubt, and the jury must acquit.
LAWFARE INDEED!
These actions are only the tip of the iceberg. See my latest article in the American Thinker:
https://www.americanthinker.com/articles/2024/04/the_deep_state_s_accelerating_attacks_on_trump_show_a_consciousness_of_guilt.html
Your article was spot on and well done. It explains what and why this is happening but not the solution to this very immediate and vexing problem.
What we all now see is like a rash that is starting to pop up and become evident ubiquitously throughout the body politic that should be as obvious and terrifying as an outbreak of small pox in an elementary school. We are all concerned as to what can be done. Great efforts are being made to prevent Trump from regaining the Presidency, because he will make Snowden, and every other whistle blower, resonate like Gunga Din did to Kipling. The truths will come out and further resonate like Encounters of the Third Kind or the Second Coming of Christ. However, the immediate issue is to get this filthy biting horsefly of a distraction off of Trump's back so he can campaign. This mockery of a trial is about getting a bogus felony conviction which is no different than a bogus felony murder or rape conviction if it does the job it was designed to do... interfere with the election day outcome. What difference will it make if it is overturned on Jan 6 2025? By then fascism 101 becomes fascism 202 and finally communism 303 in 2026 with Kamala Harris, as President, taking lesions from Kim Yo Jong, the sister of Kim Jong Un, on how to destroy America.
Possibly the best thing Trump can do is to not show up for trial and refuse to partake in the Kabuki theater drama spectacle produced by the NYC based "Lawfare Criminal Enterprise Company". The fanfare will be great but nowhere near as great as will be the Biblical fanfare associated with the bogus felony conviction that is sure to happen months from now just before the mail-in ballots go out in swing states.
What does the law have to do with this case? They just throw garbage at the wall and Merchan makes it stick. He has already written his instructions to the jury. "Even though you have already arrived at you verdict, go into that room and don't come out for at least 30 minutes. We must keep up appearances."
While this "another defense" is accurate, the fundamental argument that these are not "business records" has to be put front and center by defense counsel. The "the" and "entry" arguments are too technical.
For cryin out loud these are personal checks of DJT and payees/amounts in his own checkbook.
I presume corrupt-beyond-belief Judge Merchan's ruling must be adopting Bragg's intertwined argument which is a complete crock. As another commenter noted, business and personal accounts of shareholders must be kept separate. DJT cannot defraud or deceive himself in his own personal records.
There should be one witness on this for maybe 30 mins, exhibits of the personal checks filed with the court, a stipulation that the indictment is a correct statement of the facts that these were checks and records of DJY, and a 10 minute jury summation at most hitting this only. Anything more will give the Dem-media lots of ink to spill on other stuff and obfiscate, when this is all that matters. Publicity that this is all the defense presented will drive the point home, that any sane person can understand. A complex defense will not change the verdict, so the defense and follow on messaging needs to be short and sweet.
Motions argued with the judge and no doubt jury instructions that misinterpret the law will be completely adequate for an appeal which will overturn the verdict (after the election).
This case should never get to the jury. After Bragg finishes with his witnesses, Trump’s lawyer should move for summary judgment on the grounds that Bragg never introduced evidence that Trump’s people falsified any entries; the statute is not aimed at simply filing possibly incorrect papers with your records. You must do something more: you must actively falssify your ledgers by making false entries , which Bragg has never suggested Trump did.
If the judge is not a complete crook, he has to grant summary judgement for Trump and the case never gets to the jury.
Standard motion. Called a directed verdict in a criminal trial. Judge Merchan will never grant it in a million years or he could not live the rest of his life amongst his bubble (or with his daughter).
You could be correct. Would a complex defense argument be way over the heads of these jurors? How much confidence can be placed in this jury anyway to put their brains to it? Somehow, I think that feelings, emotions, and hatred are going to rule the day.
What a colossal buffoon.
Which, "colossal buffoon?"
How is it that you can make a payment thru your lawyer to settle a legal matter and it is not a legal expense? The nature of the legal matter being settled is irrelevant. It's a legal matter settled by a legal agreement using a legal vehicle.ie the non-discloser agreement memorialized in legal documents and signed by consulting adults under the supervision of legal counsel. That strikes me as a lot of legal stuff for it not to be a legal expense. A rather large legal expense....
Big Picture: the argument is like which teams member hit JFK. The frontal bullet hole in the windshield proves 2 shooters at least, thus a conspiracy, making the questions who was aware of it and abetted it? The list is pretty long and starts at the tippy top.
Same thing here. Shooters in Atlanta, DC, FLA, and NYC. Plainly manifest federal constitutional due process violations ongoing, including sham indictment, conflicts requiring recusal as a matter of law, insufficient evidence proferred to establish essentials element(s), manifestly unconstitutional gag order, and a schedule and voir dire intended to select a jury most inclined to convict.
But again, it doesn't really matter that James Files has sworn he rested his short fireball rifle on the picket fence for the fatal head shot any shooter could have made. The bullet to the throat was a frontal wound the Parklant doctors have maintained. Greer was the obvious failsafe, and he did slam the limo stopped for a few seconds. Did he turn around like Oddjob in Goldfinger, and deliver one of the shots? (It would explain Jackie crawling out and maybe saving her life.)
Please excuse the digression, but I just kindled the book of a Santa Clara U emeritus professor who has painstakingly reviewd the JFK files released under Trump. Nothing earth shattering. But we can guess what these files wd say (if they ever saw the light of day upon creation).
A LOT of citizens were OK with JFK getting whacked, from the tippee top on down. That's why they swallowed the blue pill of the Warren report like gullible fish. It just seems safer, and it demonstrably is.
In NYC they're down to their last shooter. They're all being controlled by POTUS regime. They have disregarded regular order for political gain. If successful, SCOTUS likely will be raised to 11 or 13, or 21, come on let's roll the dice.
Imho 6 at least of current 9 favor 9 max. That means ANY petition to SCOTUS in first instance that provides arguable grounds to STAY, or STAY and TRANFER, will RESTORE REGULAR ORDER. The cretins will say lawfare is the status quo, but most certainly will fail.
FAILING to restore Regular presidential election order will tip the scales to the incumbent, and would crash Roberts's legacy, whatever else it is. If he's bright enough, it could be another
9-0.
The question of regular presidential election order is one peculiarly within purview of SCOTUS. Where is the Pacific Legal Foundation on this, or better, Heritage Action Group. Help save the country. Engage for DJT immediate cert (and habeas since restricted by govt) and earn a stay to return to regular order. The person/ group who undertake this patriotic endeavor will be conducting themselves unassailably. Opportunities to be heroes don't often come along - especially when it comes to halting an un-American travesty Euro show trial. We are better than that. SCOTUS is uniquely situated to act NOW. Why wait? The damages are accruing and multiplying.
Their final marksman is a clod of a lawyer at DOJ (and thus a direct agent of Biden- more proof of conspiracy) who can be HALTED with a MINIMUM of effort. Thus,
we are better positioned than those on Elm Street to stop this show motion hit job.
You are an important cog. Keep going for it, and aim high.
One final note. Since conclusive physical proof exists of two or more shooters, the entire Warren Report is based on a fatal factual inaccuracy and thus should be renamed "The official USG conspiracy theory on JFK murder." All Oswald-only theorists are the real cranks.