105 Comments
User's avatar
Rev. Karlan Fairchild, MDiv's avatar

Wow, Julie, it appears that we are finally getting some evidence of the treason committed by M. Hussein Osama pertaining to the bogus Ruskie-Ruskie Hoax! I have suspected, maybe even known without conclusive evidence that that execrable former President should be tried, convicted and shot for treason. I can't begin to tell you how impressed I am with the outstanding people who President Trump has chosen to run the various agencies within the Executive branch of the federal government! I don't want to get my hopes up that these conspirators will actually get their comeuppance with indictments, arrests, trials and convictions, but hope springs eternal. And this is just the tip of the proverbial iceberg, isn't it?

Expand full comment
Randy Hill's avatar

Matt Taibbi said there’s more evidence to come.

Expand full comment
Kelly Green's avatar

I love this. I have been a Taibbi/Greenwald guy from the jump and as soon as I saw reporting "Obama has been briefed on the existence of a dossier that claims Trump..." I knew exactly what that wording implied immediately, that the IC was using the briefing as a news hook to smear with untrustworthy info. The rest was as transparent to me and the frustration was watching the number of people who got that going from 10% in 2017 to 55% in 2024 very very slowly due to the work of people like Julie.

But let's face reality. One, we knew most of this long ago. We even knew about this meeting (Susan Rice had the meeting in her notes). But we didn't have documented evidence that the actual pros in the IC were saying something different until this effort kicked off, and we didn't have evidence that Obama may have directed this somewhat. Those are good things to learn.

But, people officially at the head of an agency stopping a report and redirecting it to say what they want it to say is not going to end in repercussions or jail time. It's done all the time in non-sinister ways and it's quite simply properly within their power.

It's just a loss of face, and as such we're talking about one more straw moving more people to the side of seeing the realities of Russiagate. Maybe this takes us from 55% of people getting it to 57-58% of people getting it.

Just temper the excitement here, sorry. No comeuppance coming.

Expand full comment
Don Pauley's avatar

Yeah most of this has been long known. Just had a complicit doj at the wheel. Has anything changed? Clock is ticking.

Expand full comment
Evil Incarnate's avatar

This is a really big deal! Sounds almost too good to be true.

I've read Gabbard's X post multiple times, looking for the chinks in her armor. I'm not seeing any obvious ones. I think they've got the goods on Obama and his henchmen.

The memo from Clapper, instructing everyone to create a revised intelligence assessment BASED ON NEW GUIDANCE (not new information) seems extremely damning.

I've never seen three flaming skulls on Ace of Spades HQ before.

https://acecomments.mu.nu/?post=415722

Expand full comment
sandy picard's avatar

I am thrilled. Never thought I'd see this day. Will they get their due? We can only trust in the (what I call) Dirty Dozen our President assembled to help him right this ship. I've never seen such a cohesive group as the Cabinet he put together.

Am I reading too much into this? It seems a bit odd or coincidental that DNI publishes this bomb on the heels of the Dems underhanded moves on the Epstein saga, Maxwell wanting to regale Congress with her tail of woe and the WSJ hit piece?

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Things are definitely moving on two tracks, Sandy. Sen Grassley also released emails this week again demonstrating how Biden DOJ/FBI concocted the Jan 6 case against the president. Lisa Monaco's dirty fingerprints (article I am working on) all over it.

Expand full comment
sandy picard's avatar

Also read something by Christina Aguayno (?) that directly connected Hillary to the scheme.

Expand full comment
Don Pauley's avatar

Grassley has done more than all else in CONgress combined but still moving at a snail pace. Has been nine (9!) years.

Expand full comment
Diana Woodward's avatar

...and last night on NBC news, all they "reported" was Epstein, Epstein, Epstein.. Not a word on their messiah and his henchmen being corrupt.

Expand full comment
Don Pauley's avatar

The media has to be treated as a non option. Has to be criminal pursuit on a fast pace. Otherwise just a continuation of the cover up. Most investigations are just that - cover.

Expand full comment
Randy Hill's avatar

Tulsi and the cabinet are very brave to expose Obama and his evil henchmen. Thank you DJT for your picks!

Expand full comment
Don Pauley's avatar

Think of all the people who know and have known for nearly 10 years and done and said nothing. Incredibly brave of her.

Expand full comment
Wayne Pearson's avatar

I was once in a car wreck, being hit by a drunk-who happened to be related to a judge. Ironically, it never appeared in the paper. I called Mothers Against Drunk Driving and they got it put in the paper. They also sent me a copy of the sheriff's report. Across the top, it said, in a handwritten message, NOT FOR NEWS RELEASE.

In a way, this is like what Clapper did in creating a revised intelligence assessment.

Expand full comment
Don Pauley's avatar

This is how the world works. Unfortunately.

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Haha Ace is the best, thanks for posting.

Expand full comment
Michael Smith's avatar

The Constitution requires 2 witnesses for a treason conviction.

Sounds like there was a room full of potential rats, I wonder which will flip to save his own skin.

Expand full comment
Evil Incarnate's avatar

It's the prisoner's dilemma. There was a roomful of witnesses. They'll get 2.

Expand full comment
Randy Hill's avatar

Check out the memo in Tulsi’s press release. There’s a memo listing the names of those at a meeting in the Situation Room.

Expand full comment
Gary Arvidson's avatar

My thoughts exactly, be interesting to see what the rat pac slimes will resort to!

Expand full comment
James Thomas's avatar

Director Gabbard has one witness already - the whistleblower she mentions.

Expand full comment
Susan G's avatar

Julie, thanks for these links to source documents, which I always want to review. (I actually have read most of the opinions and other court filings on about half of the cases filed against Trump- the ones piquing my interest.) You are indispensable.

Cannot wait to see if AG Bondi follows through on this treasure trove.

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

You're welcome! I want to do more of this--post documents/files before I have a chance to write something extensive because it seems lately another scandal arises and I don't get back to my other work!

Expand full comment
Susan G's avatar

It looks like a scandalous CRIME to me. Just keep on keeping on.

Expand full comment
Teresa Maupin's avatar

The Democrat party should have to reimburse everyone this hoax touched for their legal bills and loss of income. The collateral damage is far and wide.

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Great idea--not even sure how anyone could put a number on it.

Expand full comment
Charles Wemyss, Jr.'s avatar

This certainly has been worked on thoroughly by DNI Gabbard. Given that AG Bondi got over her skis with the Epstein mess, one would assume that DNI Gabbard walked into her Boss’s office and briefed him before going on X and letting the cat out of the bag so to say. Working on the possibility that this is all true, one can guess that even if they are not brought to justice, the simple fact that these bums and traitors tried to pull this coup d’etat off tells us all we need to know about permanent Washington. They will do anything to anyone to hold on to the levers of government/absolute power. If one takes the announcement by POTUS that he wants AG Bondi to release the grand jury material on the Epstein case of 2019, those that are squealing for full transparency likely over the weekend are are going to reverse direction yet again and demand Lord knows what kind of legal relief from releasing the Grand Jury evidence in the matter. Normally here we say the only justice is in the halls, but the circumstantial evidence is beginning to look like there might be some justice. One can only imagine the scene of the older mobsters in prison cooking dinner in “Goodfella’s” and just substitute Comey, Clapper, Brennan and the Messiah for the actors. Who do you think will do the cooking and who will shave the garlic? Enquiring minds want to know….

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Haha I love that image!

Expand full comment
KimboThisIsMyCountry2's avatar

Julie, my big question at this point is Will the press suffer and consequences for also lying to the American people! They are the ones that took these lies and spread it out to the world. I think they too should suffer the same punishment! What are your thoughts?

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

I 100 PERCENT AGREE. I tweeted that at my friend Lee Smith last night and he smartly (as always) said the DOJ should not view them as journalists but as cut outs to the intel community.

Expand full comment
Pete Healey's avatar

Long overdue, but it finally feels like the deep corruption that has controlled this nation for decades is finally going to be exposed and prosecuted! I hope all those guilty are convicted and the biggest names among them should get the ultimate punishment for seditious treason; I've got a tall oak tree if needed!

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Too many hints being dropped at something major coming. When Sen Grassley speaks publicly about accountability and his office produces a nearly nonstop stream of incriminating records, that's a good sign.

Expand full comment
Michael Carlton Genest's avatar

These allegations, if proven, would fall outside the limited presidential liability doctrine just defined by SCOTUS. That means that Obama could hang, literally!

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Good point. Will be fun to watch the same people who denounced SCOTUS immunity ruling now use it to protect Obama. And the same goes for people--including commentators and judges--who eagerly stripped privilege protections from the president, his White House aides, his advisors, and even his attorneys--now pivot and decide the Russiagate perps deserve privilege.

Expand full comment
Pete Healey's avatar

Looking forward to the articles you have in the works! My one wish would be to clone you and unleash her to focus on nothing but the corruption in the judiciary. This is a woefully underreported cause, IMO. If the judges were honest and fair NONE of this could have got off the ground. A lot of these judges should have a date with my tree as well.

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Pete, you are so kind, thank you! Yes I feel like a juggler with so many topics to tackle! The challenge also is to make complicated matters understandable and not get too in the weeds (which I am on at least two pieces right now.) But I have to say the Gabbard release is very motivating with more to come!

Expand full comment
War Eagle's avatar

Finally, this confirms what Dan Bongino has been telling everyone who listened to his show quote “Everything Leads to Obama” he was behind everything and was protected by the press and all those around him. Now the question, will anything become of this, will anyone be held accountable? I guess we will have to wait and see, I am very doubtful anything will happen, I hope I am wrong.

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

That's right. My friend Lee Smith has said that all along as well. Know we have more proof.

Expand full comment
Wayne Pearson's avatar

Anyone with a BRAIN knew from the start that all of this was B.S. I voted for Trump and no one from Russia influenced me. And I didn't get anything from the wife of the former Mayor of Moscow. And . . . if Russia put something up online-so what! How did that MAKE you vote for Trump? If you are so stupid-as to believe things like Douglass Mackey telling Hillary supporters they could vote by texting “Hillary”-you shouldn't be voting at all.

There is no way Russia interfered in getting Trump elected in 2016. I don't recall millions of Russians breaking into our country, under Obama, and registering to vote, and then being put up in the Roosevelt Hotel and being given free food.

Democrats forget how the Clinton administration interfered in Israel's elections in 1996 to help then-Prime Minister Shimon Peres (Labor) defeat Binyamin Netanyahu (Likud).

Here is a link where Bill Clinton even admits it.

https://visionmag.org/clinton-admits-interfering-israeli-elections/

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

But most Democrats still think Russia helped Trump win in 2016. No amount of evidence to the contrary matters to them. He was, and is today, illegitimate in their eye. Party of brainwashed sheep.

Expand full comment
Tom Tice's avatar

Great news Julie, now we some people to brought to justice. Especially if Obama can be implemented at the top Dog in this. We can always count on you Julie. Thank you.

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Thank you, Tom. Not sure if Obama will be held criminally responsible but clearly an investigation is underway and I don't see how he avoids lawyering up on this and perhaps even being forced to produce docs/records as they did to Trump in Jan 6 and classified docs investigations.

Expand full comment
Martin Mehlberth's avatar

Once again Julie you are the first true journalist to report on this and keep all of us informed on this matter. Like many of your other subscribers I am thankful you are following this like you are. You always keep the target in focus and bring the receipts. I would like to think that all of this damning evidence will result in these evil lowlifes being convicted and executed for treason but the reality is that the Deep State usually doesn’t ever face consequences for their crimes. This would be an excellent time to prove me wrong. Thank you again for your diligence. 🙏❤️🙏

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Martin, that is truly appreciated, thank you! Your support--and that of all my paid subscribers--means to much to me. It keeps me going and working harder every day. Thanks again!

Expand full comment
Kevin M's avatar

Your key phrase is “investigated and brought to justice.” Been a whole of investigating…..but no justice. This is why so many people are in fury over Epstein. Comey, Clinton, McCabe etc all walk free but if you were a 68 yo grandmother who walked thru the capitol Jan 6th you had the book thrown at you. There is a two tier system of justice, and the tiers are miles apart.

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

No doubt it's very frustrating, Kevin. But it really does appear as though these criminals will be held accountable even for minor offenses like perjury or obstruction (or conspiracy to do either or both.) The president wants retribution for those who tried to destroy him--it's now or never.

Expand full comment
Kevin M's avatar

I got $50 worth of Declassified subscriptions if any one of them is arrested.

Expand full comment
Davi7's avatar

Corruption at the highest levels of government, by the party obsessed with their perception of who they claim represents a threat to our 'democracy-' all the while undermining the very democracy they have claimed to defend. Hopefully the brainwashed masses will accept the truth.

As for the propagandists in the media who lied to us about this and for years have defamed a sitting President- go screw yourselves you effing traitors.

Expand full comment
Julie Kelly's avatar

Haha thinking of Ketanji recently saying she stays up at night worried about the "state of our democracy." This scandal of course is not what she is talking about.

Expand full comment
James Thomas's avatar

I agree if by "party" you mean Uniparty. "Republican" Bill Barr covered all of this up because he knew about, and was in on, the conspiracy to undermine the man who appointed him.

Expand full comment