Full Court Transcript from Trump's Gag Order Hearing on October 16
Judge Tanya Chutkan, with open hostility to Donald Trump's lawyer, pushed back repeatedly as to why she shouldn't partially silence the leading GOP candidate for president. In the end, she did.
Declassified with Julie Kelly is a reader-supported publication. To receive new posts and support my work, consider becoming a free or paid subscriber.
I read partially into the court transcript, but I stopped reading because I almost fell out of my chair when the Marxist-dressed-in-a-black robe claimed, on page 26, "that politics stops at this courthouse door." Considering all of her on-the-record disparaging statements made regarding President Trump, including that he should be imprisoned already, because these disparaging statements do nothing if not betray her animosity toward President Trump. They also reveal how deeply she's involved in the Soviet-Show-Trials inside Moscow-on-the-Potomac. It's beyond the realm of imagination that politics isn't present inside that courtroom. But, then again, every sentient being knew and knows that this decision regarding the "so-called gag order" was preordained. And it quite obvious that the guilty verdict, which is certainly to come, was decided years ago by the jury pool comprised of DC voters who voted for Chi-Com Joe to the tune of 96% of the electorate. This entire despicable travesty eliminates any trace of moral authority that used to reside within the DOJ/FBI. It reminds me of the classic, old Jimmy Buffett song called "Down to the Banana Republics."
I read the whole darn transcript. Barr, Raffesberger (sp?), Pence, Miley intimidated? Ruling applies to "potential" witnesses because Trump knows, or should know, because of discovery (but we don't) who NOT to discuss? I'd like Jonathan Turley or Alan Dershowitz to explain if defendants awaiting trial lose some, or all, of their First Amendment rights.
I read partially into the court transcript, but I stopped reading because I almost fell out of my chair when the Marxist-dressed-in-a-black robe claimed, on page 26, "that politics stops at this courthouse door." Considering all of her on-the-record disparaging statements made regarding President Trump, including that he should be imprisoned already, because these disparaging statements do nothing if not betray her animosity toward President Trump. They also reveal how deeply she's involved in the Soviet-Show-Trials inside Moscow-on-the-Potomac. It's beyond the realm of imagination that politics isn't present inside that courtroom. But, then again, every sentient being knew and knows that this decision regarding the "so-called gag order" was preordained. And it quite obvious that the guilty verdict, which is certainly to come, was decided years ago by the jury pool comprised of DC voters who voted for Chi-Com Joe to the tune of 96% of the electorate. This entire despicable travesty eliminates any trace of moral authority that used to reside within the DOJ/FBI. It reminds me of the classic, old Jimmy Buffett song called "Down to the Banana Republics."
I read the whole darn transcript. Barr, Raffesberger (sp?), Pence, Miley intimidated? Ruling applies to "potential" witnesses because Trump knows, or should know, because of discovery (but we don't) who NOT to discuss? I'd like Jonathan Turley or Alan Dershowitz to explain if defendants awaiting trial lose some, or all, of their First Amendment rights.