13 Comments
User's avatar
Dave Coleman's avatar

These effin’ judges, rabid partisans all, don’t care what the law says or means. All they want is for Trump to defy one of their ludicrous orders so they can claim that he’s “breaking the law.” They should all be ashamed of the way they are defying the democratic will of the American people, but they have no shame.

A.Jean's avatar

It's rough to accept shame for something when so many of them seem to be anencephalic!

AZGal55's avatar

when SCOTUS is going to review birth right citizenship this summer how can a federal judge act on it? These activist judges need to go.

Steve Bailey's avatar

1. Thank you for watching this garbage so we didn’t have to.

2. That woman is scary.

3. That cbs clown is oh so serious.

Kevin Beck's avatar

What "evidence" does Judge John Jones provide to support his claim that President Trump's name-calling is done as an attempt to delegitimize the federal courts? Trump may be doing that as a way of bringing attention to the different federal courts misinterpreting the laws. Does the judge think that is a rational possibility? My guess is, no.

Ever since Trump won his first primary in 2016, there has been an unending barrage of false statements designed to assert that Trump is a Nazi, or a fascist. Most of those claims have been stated by people that don't know that there is a difference between the two, and can't even state what the difference is. More pointedly, they can't even explain how either is the opposite of a democracy.

A.Jean's avatar

I think it's been at least 23 years since I attempted to watch that "program" and it wasn't very interesting way back then! The whining Dumb F Idiot Party continues to belly ache whilst blowing smoke out their ears as they accuse others of doing exactly what they just did.

And in Fani Willis' case, she blows it right out her, let's say, very plump rear section! That won't be a feminine little toot...I think you can guess what senses will be seared if you are anywhere near her/him!

Michael Smith's avatar

The activist cadre of federal district judges has frittered away what for centuries was a pillar of our republic - an unbiased federal judiciary. Sure there's still a fair shake in a private civil or a criminal case, but not one involving a Trump policy. Nobody with any intellectual honesty can deny there's been a concerted effort to thwart the will of the American people and the 2024 election results, the law be damned.

Violence is never the answer. But neither is turning our court system into that of a banana republic.

Ken's avatar

We haven’t watched any fake news since 2016. Why didn’t fake news have a story on fake Trump lawsuits and biased judges? Or Schumer threatening to send people to SCOTUS homes?

Carolyn's avatar

Time to arrest these so called judges. Participating in an insurrection, a conspiracy and committing treason against we the people.

alan carpenter's avatar

All this bull is coming out and as always blaming Mr President Trump 🇺🇸 .....because this siding is about the coming elections just in all different forms to suffer Mr President Trumps 🇺🇸 supports for offices 🇺🇲⚖️🇺🇸

Thanks MISS JULIE Kelly 🇺🇸⚖️⚖️⚖️🦅🗽🇺🇸👍💥🌹

Daniel Sullivan's avatar

What a joke Esther Salas is. As if the dehumanizing rhetoric only goes one way as Julie Kelly points out. For example, as if the anti-ICE folks are as civilized as can be. At a more fundamental level, I recall how the BLM cultural revolution in 2020 basically condemned the entire system of justice in the United States and leftists wanted to burn it to the ground, like the federal courthouse in Portland. Last I checked federal judges are part of that system. And I’m not sure if I remember correctly but I thought it was Trump, not a federal judge, who had a bullet graze his ear, on top of at least two other assassination attempts. I thought I may have heard a few bad things spoken about Trump, but maybe I’m wrong because 60-Minutes does not say so.

A Ghost In The Machine's avatar

“Nothing in the Constitution has given them [the federal judges] a right to decide for the Executive, more than to the Executive to decide for them. . . . The opinion which gives to the judges the right to decide what laws are constitutional and what not, not only for themselves, in their own sphere of action, but for the Legislature and Executive also in their spheres, would make the Judiciary a despotic branch.” (Letter to Abigail Adams, September 11, 1804)

- Thomas Jefferson