44 Comments
User's avatar
War Eagle's avatar

Julie, you pose a great question, the Republicans are all about hearings which result in no action. They seem to be doing snap shots and sound bites (Dan Bongino term) to make us think they are doing the will of the people. Reminds me of the Save America Act which 80% of the voters favor. Our Judicial System has become tainted by appointed political activist, their rulings are made according to who appointed them. What is very troubling I think it is only going to get worse as the unelected Judges will rule along party lines and by their TDS, since there are no repercussions when over ruled by the SCOTUS. There are several Judges who were appointed by Trump waiting to be approved by the Senate, the Senate Majority Leader, I use the term leader loosely , continues to stall and hold up these nominations, which I call disgraceful.

Julie Kelly's avatar

If you would have asked me at the beginning of 2025--would we be in the summer of 2026 with no action from Republicans on rogue federal judges--I would have said no. How silly of me! And GOP has more reasons now than back then!

Cranky Frankie's avatar

Voter ID remains a powerful fund raising and turnout tool because it is so universally seen as reasonable. Passing legislation that throws the tool away was always going to be problematic.

Rev. Karlan Fairchild, MDiv's avatar

Thanks for this brief update, Julie. These two decisions released today indicate that there might be hope, still, that this judicial coup will end soon. But, then, you see what that idiot Chief Justice did in the "mail-in-ballot" decision and you realize that all is not what it seems...

Julie Kelly's avatar

Way too much inconsistency in what SCOTUS is doing. Roberts/ACB trying to appease both sides, it's obvious. Look at the Slaughter/Cook decisions. Why does the president have authority to fire numerous presidential appointees on various boards/commissions but not the most powerful one? I am hoping to dig into Cook opinion over the next few days.

Evil Incarnate's avatar

I share your hope Rev. But why would it end?

These judges take a rebuke from the Supreme Court as a badge of honor.

Richard Luthmann's avatar

The damage, however, is not erased by reversal. That is the dirty secret of judicial overreach. A district judge can freeze policy for months, sometimes years, and even when the Supreme Court finally corrects the error, the stolen time is gone. Deportations delayed are deportations denied. Agency control delayed is presidential authority denied. Executive power becomes theoretical while D.C. judges, activist plaintiffs, and administrative-state lawyers run out the clock. Republicans cannot keep celebrating late SCOTUS wins while ignoring the pipeline that produces these nationwide injunctions, emergency stays, and lawfare roadblocks. The Constitution gives voters a president, not a rotating panel of D.C. managers.

Julie Kelly's avatar

Well said, Richard! And keep in mind, thanks to SCOTUS, the Fifth Circuit is STILL footdragging its decision on the Alien Enemies Act. That was yet another instance where SCOTUS should have simply concluded--as it suggested--AEA is not subject to judicial review (like TPS) and allow the deportation to continue. The president will lose at least TWO YEARS on executing that policy.

Kevin Beck's avatar

It only took them 90 years to make the correct decision on Humphrey's Executor, which was a horrible decision then. But now, people from the Deep State may not have that to rely upon again.

Julie Kelly's avatar

Correct. Why did it take them so long? Why didn't they kill it in the most recent cases where they ruled in favor of the president? Just too much gamesmanship--and fear.

James Thomas's avatar

Of course you are right about the stolen time, Julie. That is the tyrannical left's main objective when they do not control the presidency or the Congress. I strive to be a realistic optimist and believe that the eyes of more and more Americans are opening, and that you are helping make that happen.

Julie Kelly's avatar

Thank you, James! And I wrote quite a bit about that during Trump's first term. No one paid a price for stealing the first half of the president's first term, which was hobbled by Robert Mueller's team and imaginary Russia collusion. History is repeating itself but now it's a roster of federal judges who are responsible. And a feckless Congress.

James Thomas's avatar

You nailed it with "feckless Congress", Julie. Its members frustrate me the most.

Don Reed's avatar

06/29/26: WDC DC court got exactly what it wanted --- tied Trump up for a long time. And now time is running OUT. If the WH doesn't pull all the fire alarms...

Julie Kelly's avatar

That's right, Don. Running out of the clock--and having watched these judges in action, they know exactly what they are doing.

Diana Woodward's avatar

Like their authoritarian brothers in Iran.

Marilyn F's avatar

It’s important that you get mad with us.

It helps us feel sane.

Julie Kelly's avatar

I'm here for you, Marilyn :)

Evil Incarnate's avatar

The district court and appellate court wrote a lot of verbiage about the harms of the people affected.

Don't want to sound callous, but what does that have to do with it?

What does the law say?

Is that even a consideration to these... judges?

Only Judge Justin Walker gave it any thought?

Julie Kelly's avatar

They have to manufacture "harm" to justify the immediate injunctions. So they concoct a variety of reasons why they plaintiffs are in danger if deported (and dangers faced by Americans in cities across the country!) so they can order a hold on the policies. Nevermind the courts are not entitled to review most of the president's immigration-related policies to begin with!

Evil Incarnate's avatar

Thanks Julie. Your explanation about needing to find an injury makes sense, up to a point.

Then again, These judges are supposed to be experts in the law. Surely the administration's attorneys would have pointed out the limitations on their review.

Do you know if that was done, and if they explained it away in their opinion?

If you don't know, please be assured, my aim is not to send you chasing down a rabbit hole.

Wayne Pearson's avatar

When the Supreme Court makes a decision each member should be asking themselves WWMD? What would Madison do?

KimboThisIsMyCountry2's avatar

Thank you Julie! I am so disgusted with our Congress. They are a bunch of useless idiots!

Julie Kelly's avatar

Yes they are!

Wayne Pearson's avatar

'Useless idiots' you say.

Among other their many malfeasances, these 'useless idiots' continue to spend money we don’t have, and they still get paid. We pay these 'useless idiots' $93,612,000 (ninety three million, six hundred twelve thousand dollars a year (538 × 174,000) and those with titles like Speaker make even more. We're certainly getting less bang for our buck. If they truly cared for America we would be a much better country and we wouldn't have $39trillion in debt. 'Useless idiots' you say-how about just 'idiots'!

VeeAnn's avatar

Another great article Julie!

Indeed when will the republicans grow up, put their big people pants on, have spine and get things done for we the people. Disgusting what they are doing.

Julie Kelly's avatar

Thanks, VeeAnn! If they manage to keep the House, we need to turn up the heat to Hell level and force them to finally hold these judges accountable.

Bryan McMinn's avatar

Once again you're ahead of the story.

Thanks for keeping the facts in the mind's of us all!

Remembering how many lies comes out of the MSM to muddy the water is what I appreciate more and more about your writing!

Thanks you for keeping the facts in the light! :-)

I always look forward to your reporting.

Julie Kelly's avatar

I appreciate that, Bryan, and am so grateful for your support!

Wayne Pearson's avatar

A couple of washed up and washed out Ohio Republicans referring to Kasich and DeWine-two of the biggest losers I've ever seen. I can just see the Bella twins (WWE) with their fingers up to their foreheads forming L's.

In another decision that came down after this post allowing birthright citizenship-If I was in China, Russia, Iran, N. Korea, and so on I'd floof the USA with pregnant women so they could give birth to a potential president. Congress needs to do something but with losers like mentioned above and the current crop of losers in congress, Tillis, Murkowski, Cornyn, Cassidy, (loved him in the Partridge Family), McConnell et al., we won't get anything done and Thune is ineffective-just a taller McConnell.

In the house, there's also no unity.

As bad as they are the democrats always stick together (against America) no matter how stupid their ideas are. The republicans are basically GUTLESS!!!

We need an amendment to stop the tourist birthright citizenship. We truly are a stupid country to let this go on and on-refer back to my comments on China, Russia above.

We're potentially allowing the creation of thousands-if not more-Manchurian Candidates and they're not even hiding in the shadows.

I'd also like to comment on the commie socialist that won in New York. It will take real America loving New Yorkers who identify as democrat to stand up to this nonsense. People that came to America to escape this lifestyle need to put partisan politics aside and vote for the 'gutless' Republicans. No one that is breaking into America for a better life is coming here for SOCIALISM.

As for those that want 13 on the Supreme Court, Trump should oblige them and appoint four more-including Aileen Cannon.

Julie Kelly's avatar

Wayne, I haven't had a chance to read the decision in full but plan to over the weekend. Of course KBJ turned her concurrence into a full blown racial screed--how shameful that Roberts and ACB sided with the Lilith Fair cohort on such an historic and consequential matter.

Michele Munn's avatar

Hear! Hear!!

Rev. Karlan Fairchild, MDiv's avatar

On another related subject pertaining to the Supreme Court, the recently released decision on Birthright Citizenship, indicates and illustrates that the idiot Chief Justice just screwed us again and didn't even kiss us in the process...

Jccan's avatar

Julie Kelly

Jun 29

👏👏👏👏🇺🇲🎯💥

A snippet of Julie's wit:

"In doing so, the justices re-established executive authority and disabused those who envision a non-existent fourth branch of government that operates “independently” of the Constitutionally-established three." 🇺🇲🇺🇲🇺🇲

"...Humphrey’s has for decades been a result in search of a rationale.”"

👏👏👏

"The encroachment by the judiciary onto executive branch authority is most prevalent in Washington courtrooms; their decisions have drastically stymied the president’s agenda on a number of fronts including immigration, the federal workforce, the military, entitlement programs, and foreign affairs." 😠😡🤬

"And no amount of SCOTUS reversals can get that stolen time back." 😮‍💨😮‍💨

This may well be your best work 💥

Thank you Julie Kelly for your clarity of thought 😍

Walt Nelson's avatar

and how long will tune refuse to act on Trump appointed judges that r waiting for congress to approve

Wayne Pearson's avatar

Until there's something in it for him. Why should he care? He still gets paid.

Cranky Frankie's avatar

Those DC Circuit Court judges are probably auditioning for the anticipated new seats on SCOTUS, once the crazies add four new justices to the nine.

Julie Kelly's avatar

For sure. A Democratic president will have an embarrassment of riches on the DC Circuit!