27 Comments

I wonder if Nancy Pelosi would be as determined for the Supreme Court to uphold the principle that “no one is above the law” if she is one day held accountable for her role in assuring that J6 became a riot and for the violation of the constitutional rights of so many Americans caught up in her insurrectionist plan to destroy Trump?

Expand full comment
Feb 29·edited Feb 29

Let's get something straight regarding Pan, the meathead circuit court judge, that thinks that it would be illegal for a President to take out the opposition political candidate using Seal Team 6. What about the fact that the FBI tried it, using FISA warrants and the Russian Hoax which would have resulted in the incarceration, and death while incarcerated, of Donald Trump prior to the 2016 election because that is not speculative? It was what really happened and was actually set up by Clinton, her legal firm, and then adopted, and acted upon, by the Obama Administration and approved by President Barack Obama himself. What they intended to do in 2016 is exactly what they are intending to do, again, in 2024. The hypocrisy and irony should shatter any delusions regarding the lawlessness of the Party that named itself as but a metaphor for the word "democracy", when it is the furthest thing the Greeks ever imagined regarding the actual meaning.

Expand full comment

“The Supreme Court is placing itself on trial with its decision to hear the former president's total immunity claim. It remains to be seen whether the justices will uphold the fundamental American value that no one is above the law - not even a former president.” Nancy Pelosi

Many people believe that America is simply too big and too powerful to collapse but many people also believed that about the Soviet Union. No one in 1985 would have believed that the USSR, the mighty "Evil Empire,” would be a disintegrating mess in just a few years. I told that to someone last year who said "But the Soviet Union was a collection of separate countries.” What we have here though is a collection of separate realities which is a much deadlier situation. No society so devoid of trust and so full of hate can survive as a nation.

Expand full comment
Feb 29·edited Feb 29

Excellent video by Glenn Greenwald who points out how truly insane the democrats have become. Democrat’s presidential campaign will be their media vs Trump and their message will be Russia, Russia, Russia and Racism, Racism, Racism. Their hatred of Putin and Russia is only matched by their hatred of Trump and MAGA. They are quite insane.

“What does Captain Ahab symbolize?”


“Ahab is a symbol of the destructive nature of man. He symbolizes vengeance and obsession in his quest to destroy the white whale.”

Brace Yourself: Media Revives Russia Hysteria for 2024. (20 min)

Glenn Greenwald. Feb 28, 2024

https://youtu.be/i53FVkfZyS0?si=dgGMDsNXZTW7YMcE

Inside Trump’s plan for mass deportations: ‘America is going to target people who are not white’

Yahoo News. NBCUniversal. Feb 25, 2024

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/news/inside-trumps-plan-mass-deportations-012826457.html

Expand full comment

Another clear case of Jack Smith abusing language, and therefore abusing his power. Just like Plato's sophists from classic antiquity. He is purposefully confounding the "public" interest with those of the "Democrats,” and a "fair" trial with a foreordained "partisan” result.

As an example to quote Smith directly from this story:

“Delay in the resolution of these charges threatens to frustrate the 'public' interest in a speedy and 'fair' verdict…” – Jack Smith (emphasis mine)

What Smith is really saying, as we all know, is:

“Delay in the resolution of these charges threatens to frustrate the 'Democrats' interest in a speedy and 'partisan' verdict…”

Expand full comment

If anything that Trump did was that egregious, charges would have been brought in 2021. This is all political.

As far as immunity, if Trump doesn't have it-than neither does Bush, Obama, Clinton or Carter, so they need be prepared to have lawsuits brought against them. Even if there aren't real charges they can always have 'TRUMPed' up some charges brought against them.

Expand full comment

My thinking is that even Justice Roberts is now seeing where these prosec… excuse me, persecutions are now leading. They imperil belief in “blind justice” and thus tear at the very foundation of our rule of law.

It is painfully obvious that these persecutions are not based in seeking justice but exacting revenge and assuaging personal hatred’s. Hatred’s that are utterly irrational and based solely upon acceptance-as truth- of the propaganda that is wrecking our nation.

I believe the Court is going to find for President Trump- I believe the Court intends to find for Trump- to put an end to this nonsense and put these haters out of their misery.

Expand full comment
Feb 29·edited Feb 29

What does the US Constitution say concerning a President regarding high crimes? It provides only one solution... impeachment and removal. The Framers, and subsequent Administrations, could have amended the Constitution to add other remedies. They did not because, if they had, no Executive would be able to effectively govern America for fear of reprisals outside of the impeachment clause and especially after their office term expired. Every presidency would be threatened by the opposition party during and after their term in office. Is that any way to run a county?

The President is the only citizen that is above the very laws that pertain to every other citizen. It is similar to the way a foreign diplomat is treated. A diplomat is never prosecuted by the laws which pertain to American citizens. The law, as it pertains to diplomats, only permits their expulsion from the country whose laws they violate.

Expand full comment

Once again, Julie, you have willingly gone into this thicket of the weaponization of the legal system to provide a succinct snapshot of the decision by SCOTUS to hear oral arguments on 04/22/2024. Of course, those brief examples of the hysteria emanating from the Marxists' was delicious to read, especially the two by Pelosi and Weissmann. Only God knows how the Court will decide the issue, especially considering how unpredictable the Chief Justice can be. In the best of all possible worlds, the decision should be unanimous, which would put an end to the ridiculous attempt by the Marxist-Demo party to criminalize official Presidential acts. All that remains for us to do is pray that SCOTUS will uphold the absolute immunity accorded to the President. Otherwise, the United States descent into honest-to-God Third World status will continue apace. If that happens, only prayer will help.

Expand full comment

Megyn at CPAC.

“Keep At It”: Megyn Kelly Gives Legal Advice to Trump Related to His Prosecutions. (1 min)

Megyn Kelly. Feb 29, 2024

https://youtube.com/shorts/e-_M8ZiWV3g?si=djylnNwJUMXE_8-W

Expand full comment

We have to remember post-Roe that decisions and laws re: abortion belong to the States; no longer the Federal Government.

Expand full comment