27 Comments

I wonder if Nancy Pelosi would be as determined for the Supreme Court to uphold the principle that “no one is above the law” if she is one day held accountable for her role in assuring that J6 became a riot and for the violation of the constitutional rights of so many Americans caught up in her insurrectionist plan to destroy Trump?

Expand full comment

We lack a common reality, have become incomprehensible to each other and can no longer communicate. Where is the common ground in such an infinitely wide divide? There obviously is none. We always just talk past each other. This can only get worse and is getting worse by the day. The same people who insist Jan 6 was an “Insurrection!” have no problem with Joe’s open southern border or his campaign to replace meritocracy wherever it can be found with Equity aka Equal Outcomes. This is just not working at all. Could it be that the reason why America is so rapidly unraveling externally is because it no longer exists as a country internally?

Expand full comment

Our colleges and universities are indoctrination centers. An anti-Trump friend asked me why “educated” voters support Biden. He thought he was proving a point. He was, but not the one he thought he was proving. I told him that “educated” voters know a lot of things that are spectacularly wrong. For example, most “educated” voters know that Trump’s claim that the 2020 election was stolen was a “lie.” To them, it’s not a claim that they think is wrong. Nor can they process any evidence that supports the claim.

They believe that J6 was an “insurrection” even though the idea that Trump somehow could stop Congress from certifying the election by encouraging a group of random, unarmed, untrained, unprepared supporters who were there because they thought they had the right to protest is absurd. The “Fedsurrection” argument seems to make a lot more sense and the evidence is there. However, our educated elites can’t see it.

However, they have no doubt that there has been a massive increase in the number of children with gender dysphoria or that climate change is an imminent disaster. Neither are remotely plausible, but every “educated” person knows it.

In 2024 America, the less “educated” you are the better.

Expand full comment

To your point, I don't even bother calling them college "educated." College "indoctrinated" is more precise.

Expand full comment
Feb 29·edited Feb 29

Dead on! Especially virtue signaling, suburban, college educated women who are some of the most irrational, bigoted, prejudicial people I have once had to deal with professionally. Exactly what would disturb them, based upon nullification of the law, or complete lawlessness, that would make them vote for a lawful Trump? They will scream about his lawlessness but almost immediately, disengage in any meaningful conversation to discuss the bullet points of what they claim as true as opposed to yours. And a lot of such characteristics, not all, but a lot, I believe has to do with brain chemistry that is biological and what is conferred, even before birth. Most of my friends are women and I don't spend much time with unintelligent friends; they are extremely rational. Many women are more so than most men. However, if the presidential election were held tomorrow and only women could vote I believe the majority of states would support Biden. Ask yourself why and if you try to depend on a non-biological answer your brain will be searching endlessly and, ultimately, explode. Yes, as a veterinarian, I have a strong a chemistry, physiology, and cultural anthropological background, so I have an advantage in what 1,2 penta hydroxy phenanthrene ring structure molecules can do to influence behavior. We are not fallen angels, we are risen apes and are dimorphic not only in appearances but neurologically as well. Maybe AI, as Seva hopes, will prevent suicide by our war making technology but certainly not with the current Administration in charge for another 4 years.

Expand full comment

It might be that women, more than men, are uncomfortable having their views challenged. If everyone they know believes that climate change is an existential crisis, it must be. If everyone they know knows that Trump is a racist, he’s a racist. They are less likely to challenge it. That being said, there are plenty of strong women who think for themselves. Hopefully, there will be more and more. How many Laken Rileys will it take?

Expand full comment

Here’s a fascinating video about how AI is being used to determine brain differences in males and females which strongly influence behavior. Just imagine what will happen when this AI starts determining differences in black and white brains. Tucker says Letitia James has an IQ of about 85. No doubt AI would confirm this. I’m sure AI would also say this about Fani Willis, Kim Foxx and Chicago’s appallingly incompetent mayor, Brandon Johnson.

As for simulations, quantum physics indicates we live in a simulation but is there a “base reality” where superior beings created our simulation? According to Eastern religions and Western mysticism, God is the base reality and we are a dream, a simulation, in the mind of God who also infinitely transcends his creation. I think that’s pretty much the truth of our existence in a nutshell.

“This approach captures the intricate interplay among different brain regions. When the researchers tested the model on around 1,500 brain scans, it could almost always tell if the scan came from a woman or a man.”

“The model's success suggests that detectable sex differences do exist in the brain but just haven't been picked up reliably before. The fact that it worked so well in different datasets, including brain scans from multiple sites in the U.S. and Europe, make the findings especially convincing as it controls for many confounds that can plague studies of this kind.”

"This is a very strong piece of evidence that sex is a robust determinant of human brain organization," Menon said.

“Elon Musk’s Statement Shocks the Entire Reality! AGI, living in a simulation, Groq, Q-Star and Gemma.” (19 min)

Wes Roth. Feb 22, 2024

https://youtu.be/sJMduj9ahCU?si=gxSVEfy0XpoG9pNI

“Groq’s AI Chip Breaks Speed Records.” (8 min)

Groq. Feb 14, 2024

World Governments Summit in Dubai.

https://youtu.be/pRUddK6sxDg?si=54FS-txPQJBEsUtK

Expand full comment

I graduated New York University 40 years ago. It was liberal, but I started out college believing I was a Democrat and after college and law school and a lot of reading and thinking became a Ronald Reagan conservative. I compared reality as I saw it to what the media said about Reagan and it didn’t make sense. The media slandered Reagan - an “amiable dunce,” Bedtime for Bonzo, etc. In the 80s, you could be a Reagan supporter in a liberal college. Unfortunately, today’s Stalinists will make Trump supporters or anyone who thinks for themselves miserable. Thank God for Turning Point and Charlie Kirk.

Expand full comment

“In 2024 America, the less “educated” you are the better.”

I dropped out of high school in Chicago when I was 16, joined the Marines when I was 17, turned 18 in boot camp in San Diego and in 1969, when I was 19, got orders for the Ground Forces of the Third Marine Division in Vietnam although we got detoured and kept on Okinawa instead. From there I spent time in Japan, the Philippines, Taiwan and Hong Kong. After the Marines I worked in Chicago factories (CNC machinery) with mostly immigrants from all over the world. Excellent people with traditional values. Basically, I got my education from reading all kinds of things, from what I learned in the Marines and from the immigrants who would tell me stories of their lives which was quite fascinating. Seems though that all the people in my life were working class people who had common sense which is noticeably lacking in our highly “educated” elite class. That’s pretty much our situation in a nutshell.

Expand full comment

You still have anti-Trump friends?

Expand full comment

I live in New York. They’re all around. Their inability to offer any arguments against Trump other than Russia, the 2020 election (at least a few have an uneasy suspicion that it could have been stolen) or J6 gives me confidence that they really cannot offer arguments. They can’t discuss the border. They can’t address the profound abuse of the legal system to tie up Trump. They can’t explain Biden’s corruption. It’s simply “Orange Man Bad.”

Expand full comment
Feb 29·edited Feb 29

Let's get something straight regarding Pan, the meathead circuit court judge, that thinks that it would be illegal for a President to take out the opposition political candidate using Seal Team 6. What about the fact that the FBI tried it, using FISA warrants and the Russian Hoax which would have resulted in the incarceration, and death while incarcerated, of Donald Trump prior to the 2016 election because that is not speculative? It was what really happened and was actually set up by Clinton, her legal firm, and then adopted, and acted upon, by the Obama Administration and approved by President Barack Obama himself. What they intended to do in 2016 is exactly what they are intending to do, again, in 2024. The hypocrisy and irony should shatter any delusions regarding the lawlessness of the Party that named itself as but a metaphor for the word "democracy", when it is the furthest thing the Greeks ever imagined regarding the actual meaning.

Expand full comment

Is the Electoral Fix Already In?

“The 2024 presidential race increasingly looks like it will be decided by lawyers, not voters, as Democrats unveil plans for America's first lawfare election.”

Real Clear Politics. Racket News. Matt Taiibi. Jan 26, 2024

https://www.racket.news?utm_source=navbar&utm_medium=web&r=cldfa

Expand full comment
Feb 29·edited Feb 29

Of course. So was the 2020 election decided by attorneys and that included attorneys with robes which is the complete opposite of how the 2000 race was determined. The 2000 race was determined by the Constitution because Chief Justice William Rehnquist was a Constitutional justice as opposed to Chief Justice John Roberts. Rehnquist cited the Constitutional requirement that the State legislature, and not the courts, or election officials or attorneys, gets to determine how presidential elections are run. The justices on the Florida Supreme Court realized that they were Constitutionally inept and that their decision, to count chads, would have been Constitutionally challenged and overruled by the SCOTUS hence they ultimately allowed the Florida legislature to manage the election. Finally the Bush slate was selected by the Legislature which is the body which most represents the people and that ended all the non-constitutional legal hubris.

Today, we are no longer even close to the Constitutional Republic we have to be in order to survive as a Republic, other than in name only. We are not even a democracy.

Expand full comment

“The Supreme Court is placing itself on trial with its decision to hear the former president's total immunity claim. It remains to be seen whether the justices will uphold the fundamental American value that no one is above the law - not even a former president.” Nancy Pelosi

Many people believe that America is simply too big and too powerful to collapse but many people also believed that about the Soviet Union. No one in 1985 would have believed that the USSR, the mighty "Evil Empire,” would be a disintegrating mess in just a few years. I told that to someone last year who said "But the Soviet Union was a collection of separate countries.” What we have here though is a collection of separate realities which is a much deadlier situation. No society so devoid of trust and so full of hate can survive as a nation.

Expand full comment
Feb 29·edited Feb 29

Excellent video by Glenn Greenwald who points out how truly insane the democrats have become. Democrat’s presidential campaign will be their media vs Trump and their message will be Russia, Russia, Russia and Racism, Racism, Racism. Their hatred of Putin and Russia is only matched by their hatred of Trump and MAGA. They are quite insane.

“What does Captain Ahab symbolize?”


“Ahab is a symbol of the destructive nature of man. He symbolizes vengeance and obsession in his quest to destroy the white whale.”

Brace Yourself: Media Revives Russia Hysteria for 2024. (20 min)

Glenn Greenwald. Feb 28, 2024

https://youtu.be/i53FVkfZyS0?si=dgGMDsNXZTW7YMcE

Inside Trump’s plan for mass deportations: ‘America is going to target people who are not white’

Yahoo News. NBCUniversal. Feb 25, 2024

https://currently.att.yahoo.com/news/inside-trumps-plan-mass-deportations-012826457.html

Expand full comment

There is also another Greenwald episode on his Rumble channel that I highly recommend.

You may have seen it but it is was about 2 or 3 weeks ago in which he covers Russia Gate in depth. It's over two hours long and he does a great job unpacking the convoluted story.

Expand full comment

I did watch that. It was great. Glenn is one of our very best and he’s not even conservative. He’s a leftist appalled by what a monstrosity the Woke left has become. Same with Bret Weinstein. We do by far have the most high quality people on our side. Like the difference between day and night. Really amazing how deep and clear the divide is.

Expand full comment

Also, the Captain Ahab parallel is perfect.

Expand full comment

Another clear case of Jack Smith abusing language, and therefore abusing his power. Just like Plato's sophists from classic antiquity. He is purposefully confounding the "public" interest with those of the "Democrats,” and a "fair" trial with a foreordained "partisan” result.

As an example to quote Smith directly from this story:

“Delay in the resolution of these charges threatens to frustrate the 'public' interest in a speedy and 'fair' verdict…” – Jack Smith (emphasis mine)

What Smith is really saying, as we all know, is:

“Delay in the resolution of these charges threatens to frustrate the 'Democrats' interest in a speedy and 'partisan' verdict…”

Expand full comment

If anything that Trump did was that egregious, charges would have been brought in 2021. This is all political.

As far as immunity, if Trump doesn't have it-than neither does Bush, Obama, Clinton or Carter, so they need be prepared to have lawsuits brought against them. Even if there aren't real charges they can always have 'TRUMPed' up some charges brought against them.

Expand full comment

My thinking is that even Justice Roberts is now seeing where these prosec… excuse me, persecutions are now leading. They imperil belief in “blind justice” and thus tear at the very foundation of our rule of law.

It is painfully obvious that these persecutions are not based in seeking justice but exacting revenge and assuaging personal hatred’s. Hatred’s that are utterly irrational and based solely upon acceptance-as truth- of the propaganda that is wrecking our nation.

I believe the Court is going to find for President Trump- I believe the Court intends to find for Trump- to put an end to this nonsense and put these haters out of their misery.

Expand full comment
Feb 29·edited Feb 29

What does the US Constitution say concerning a President regarding high crimes? It provides only one solution... impeachment and removal. The Framers, and subsequent Administrations, could have amended the Constitution to add other remedies. They did not because, if they had, no Executive would be able to effectively govern America for fear of reprisals outside of the impeachment clause and especially after their office term expired. Every presidency would be threatened by the opposition party during and after their term in office. Is that any way to run a county?

The President is the only citizen that is above the very laws that pertain to every other citizen. It is similar to the way a foreign diplomat is treated. A diplomat is never prosecuted by the laws which pertain to American citizens. The law, as it pertains to diplomats, only permits their expulsion from the country whose laws they violate.

Expand full comment

Once again, Julie, you have willingly gone into this thicket of the weaponization of the legal system to provide a succinct snapshot of the decision by SCOTUS to hear oral arguments on 04/22/2024. Of course, those brief examples of the hysteria emanating from the Marxists' was delicious to read, especially the two by Pelosi and Weissmann. Only God knows how the Court will decide the issue, especially considering how unpredictable the Chief Justice can be. In the best of all possible worlds, the decision should be unanimous, which would put an end to the ridiculous attempt by the Marxist-Demo party to criminalize official Presidential acts. All that remains for us to do is pray that SCOTUS will uphold the absolute immunity accorded to the President. Otherwise, the United States descent into honest-to-God Third World status will continue apace. If that happens, only prayer will help.

Expand full comment

Megyn at CPAC.

“Keep At It”: Megyn Kelly Gives Legal Advice to Trump Related to His Prosecutions. (1 min)

Megyn Kelly. Feb 29, 2024

https://youtube.com/shorts/e-_M8ZiWV3g?si=djylnNwJUMXE_8-W

Expand full comment

We have to remember post-Roe that decisions and laws re: abortion belong to the States; no longer the Federal Government.

Expand full comment
Feb 29·edited Feb 29

But that is how how the media will play it and how women will perceive it. The Party of so called democracy is a party of tyranny supported by propaganda and indoctrination far removed from truth and facts.

Expand full comment