The Audacity of Merrick Garland
The attorney general once again claims politics plays no role in the actions of the Department of Justice--all evidence to the contrary.
FBI agents last week arrested a man from Maine for his involvement in the events of January 6. According to a Department of Justice press release, Lincoln Deming spent about 30 minutes inside the building after entering through an open door with Capitol Police standing by. Deming faces numerous charges including civil disorder and the dreaded “parading” in the Capitol misdemeanor.
The DOJ bragged in the press release about the government’s scalp count for its unprecedented prosecution of Jan 6 protesters. “More than 1,424 individuals have been charged in nearly all 50 states for crimes related to the breach of the U.S. Capitol,” Matthew Graves, the Joe Biden-appointed U.S. Attorney for the District of Columbia, boasted. The investigation into the four-hour disturbance, Graves warned, is “ongoing.”
Indeed. The DOJ, astonishingly, is on pace to arrest one J6 protester a day this year; Graves has stated his intention to bring the total caseload to at least 2,000 defendants before the statute of limitations expires.
If DOJ Didn’t Have Double Standards, It Would Have No Standards at All…Oh Wait
At the same time, the DOJ refuses to bring federal charges against pro-Palestinian demonstrators who in many instances engaged in similar if not worse conduct inside Congressional buildings over the past six months.
Graves’ spokeswoman recently confirmed to me via email that all cases stemming from arrests of pro-Palestinian protesters are being handled by the local D.C. prosecutor.
In other words, no federal obstruction of an official proceeding indictments against those who repeatedly interrupted Senate and House hearings to protest against the Israel-Gaza war. No federal “parading” charges for demonstrators who unlawfully occupied government buildings in Washington on multiple occasions. Even demonstrators who assaulted Capitol police outside the DNC headquarters last November do not face federal charges--a shocking double-standard since hundreds of J6ers have been federally charged with assault on police, even for minor confrontations, often resulting in lengthy prison sentences and pretrial detention in several cases.
Which makes recent comments by Attorney General Merrick Garland all the more outrageous--and demonstrably false. Before two House committees voted Thursday to advance contempt of Congress against Garland for defying a congressional subpoena demanding the audio recording of Biden’s interview with Special Counsel Robert Hur last year, Garland mustered his most sanctimonious self to explain how House Republicans, not him, threaten the legitimacy of the DOJ—a “fundamental institution of our democracy,” Garland claimed. (Garland advised Biden to invoke executive privilege to prevent producing the tapes to Congress; Biden only too happily accepted his counsel.)
Garland audaciously claimed politics plays no role in determining what investigations his department pursues.
Watch and try not to laugh or throw things:
Without political influence?
If the country had a real news media instead of boot-lickers who ask Garland about his hurt feelings when people criticize the DOJ, at least one reporter would have confronted Garland about the ongoing prosecution of J6ers while letting Hamasurrectionists off the hook.
A reporter would have asked Garland how many times the DOJ seeks pretrial detention for political protesters accused of assaulting police, as the DOJ has done in dozens of J6 cases.
A reporter would have asked Garland how often the FBI conducts armed raids of Americans accused of nonviolent offenses, as the FBI has done in hundreds of J6 cases and continues to do.
A reporter would have asked Garland about the possibility the Supreme Court will reverse how his DOJ has applied a post-Enron statute against 350 or so J6ers, turning many otherwise nonviolent protesters into convicted felons.
A reporter also would have asked Garland about two recent D.C. appellate court decisions that overturned excessive sentencing requests made by the DOJ.
A reporter would have asked Garland why he authorized an armed FBI raid of Mar-a-Lago to search for classified documents but didn’t do the same for Joe Biden or Mike Pence.
A reporter would have asked Garland why he should not be held in contempt of Congress for defying a House subpoena while his prosecutors indicted both Steve Bannon and Peter Navarro—who is currently doing time in a Miami prison—for contempt after they defied subpoenas by the January 6 Select Committee.
A reporter would have asked Garland why his office just boasted about imprisoning several individuals including two women in their 70s for protesting outside a D.C. abortion clinic in 2020 while nearly all federal charges against 2020 BLM rioters have been dropped.
You get the drift.
The fascinating backdrop here is that the Biden regime and news media warn a second Trump presidency will result in a crusade of retribution and retaliation against his sworn enemies—including DOJ and FBI officials.
Given Garland’s performance as attorney general, one can only hope that’s true.
Part of Garland’s letter to Biden
If you don't believe in America, Liberty, GOD, Our Constitution, or freedom, than you can protest with impunity.
However if you have values, and believe in your country, you might as well pack a bag for a lengthy prison stay.
Who knew entering the Capitol after a Capitol police officer opened the door for you was illegal?
Only in America-once the land of the free.
Thank GOD that Merrick 'double talk' Garland didn't get on the Supreme Court.
The ordinary Americans who went to Capitol Hill on J6 went to peacefully petition their elected lawmakers to consider the evidence that was going to presented that showed that the 2020 election results in certain states should not have been certified. This disparate group of Americans from all over the country were not professional activists. They were not funded. They were not violent people. They were pawns. The riot that ensued was fomented by a handful of provocateurs, inexplicably aggressive actions by certain police while other police welcomed them into the Capitol.
The far more violent George Floyd protests, which featured organized and funded BLM and Antifa activists, were treated very patiently by the police. In fact, multiple blue jurisdictions paid the left wing activist protesters damages if the police used any force at all. The pro-Hamas protesters also are organized left wing activists and are receiving the same kid gloves treatment.
Why the difference in how different protesters are treated? In both cases, the DOJs actions have not been based on actual events and actual criminal activity, but in furtherance of a false political storyline. How do you prove that Trump supporters are violent white supremacists? You lure them into a riot and arrest them. How do you prove that Trump is a threat to democracy? You call his perfectly legal conduct crimes and indict him? How do you enrage fair minded Americans? You prosecute J6 defendants and Trump for what clearly are not crimes, but release violent left wing activists and even pay them for the damages they cause.