The fate of the nation rests in the hands of unserious and conflicted judges setting gotcha traps for Team Trump rather than conducting a serious debate on matters of dire consequence for the future.
So many of America’s "systems" are rotten to the core. Name one that you respect and trust. This must change. DJT is an effective agent of change. That is why he is so important to our future and why the Uniparty Rats hate him. Pray...
I am thoroughly disgusted with these appointed judges! They are nothing but democrat hacks! If the media was actually doing their first amendment obligation, this would be front and center every day. I am really sick of being called part of a cult. Yes. That must have been the democrat’s email of the week!
WOW...I mean Seriously W O W! That was some article Lady Julie!
With judges like those three that Donald Trump is up against, he's lucky to have any gonads left at all. These people aren't going for the throat, they are going for the gonads, the throat, the liver, kidneys and esophagus. Not to mention, they are laying concrete in the entire rectal area!
When anybody uses the phrase "A Two Tiered Justice System" they should see a picture of Biden AND Obama's fully fledged National Democrat Judicial scaffold. And that posse of extremely willing participants in the incarcerating machine going after Donald Trump (for the rest of his bloody life) wing of each and every Demo lawyer's office building, is working overtime. But, if that cannot be accomplished forthwith, it's just not outright out of the question by these Biden/Obama Lawfare python snakes to put a full race hit for hire on him instead!
I wonder how many movies have already been depicted in this very design of if not maiming a Presidential candidate then outright put him down! I deeply fear for President Trump and I'm of the mind to believe that my fear is well founded!
Seriously, look what happened to Ashli Babbitt and she wasn't actually IN THE CROSSHAIRS of the Democrat/Leftist/Liberal/Progressive AR-15 Brigade!!
In fairness, a lot of this started with the Paula Jones prosecution. SCOTUS ruled that a President was not immune for acts committed outside his term. And we had an Independent Counsel law then. It has since expired. But the current prosecutions will significantly expand the scope of what is permitted.
It seems crazy to empower states' Attorneys General (or even county attorneys looking for a headline) to bring civil or criminal charges against a sitting President. Affirmation of the Trump charges will do just that. Given the differing and often contradictory nature of the various State statutes, Presidents from now on will spend their time in court in various state capitals.
Presidents rarely act on the basis of their own information. The Executive is filled with various experts and advisors. These individuals mostly lack authority except to advise and inform. The President gives actual orders. If the President is indictable, these advisors are as well under the rubric of conspiracy or obstruction. So no sane person will want those jobs since they'll come with significant risk and uncertainty.
The risk to all of us is that the Trump prosecutions, if successful, effectively displace the President as head of the Executive, substituting the Judiciary. Hopefully Roberts can explain that to the three and apprise them of the risk that presents when one of theirs is in the Oval. Likely he'll tell them that this will bring back States' Rights by neutering the President. A unanimous decision seems necessary here, much as the "Honest Services" state statutes have been somewhat recently circumscribed in the Bob McDonnell case.
Otherwise similar statutes, unconstitutionally vague and charged against sitting or former presidents will be the vehicle of choice for every state AG seeking a Senate or Governor's office while the President will become just a guy behind a cool desk looking over his/her shoulder all day.
If it weren't for you dogged and consistent reporting, Julie, I (and we who subscribe to your platform) wouldn't have the foggiest idea of the travesty of justice which is occurring daily inside Moscow-on-the-Potomac. Your in-depth analysis is not only informative but frightening, as well, especially the part about the involvement of F. Pan in the Carter Page debacle. I wish I could claim that I'm surprised to learn about the nuts-and-bolts of the Soviet-Show-Trials presided over by Marxists-wearing-black-robes, but, unfortunately, that wouldn't be an honest statement. At this point, all that stands between we who consider ourselves patriots are the upcoming decisions by SCOTUS, and, frankly, that scares the hell out of me. At the risk of being redundant, all that's left for us to do is pray and put this in God's hands, as it were.
Restraint and Maturity. These are two-character traits missing in the incestuous swamp of Washington DC's judicial system. Where are the Democrat statesmen or women willing to stand up for the integrity of the United States? RFK Jr. tried to, but he was quickly scuttled. It's all very discouraging.
Excellent and highly informative post. Sadly, Pan and so many other judges sit where they do, exposing their partisanship and incompetence, due to the Senate’s elimination of the filibuster for judicial (and other) nominees. She was confirmed to replace now-Justice Jackson 52-42. Before Harry Reid and Senate Democrats destroyed the filibuster, that would have killed her nomination.
There are some things that the Law cannot address with clarity or the way we would like. For instance, if a foreign ambassador were to rape and kill an American citizen, he could not be prosecuted. He therefore could not be convicted. He could however, be sent back to his country of origin. Hence, a President, who uses his plenary executive power to kill his opponent faces impeachment and removal as the only remedy.
If Lincoln had assassinated Jefferson Davis would he have even been impeached?
I have said this previously. The President of the United States is treated differently than any other citizen. It has to be that way to effectively manage America in both peacetime and wartime.
It seems that everyday my cynicism regarding the corrupt nature of the federal judiciary is validated.
On the optimistic side, I just watched J6 A True Timeline yesterday, so maybe something good will come of it. I also watched Tucker interview Clay Higgins regarding J6. He calls a spade a spade, so maybe something good will come of that.
It is not a difficult task to remove the most politically connected jurists from a political trial. With 12 sitting judges, and three required, it appears consideration of the circumstances requiring recusal is not often considered for either party. Perhaps my numbers are wrong.
So many of America’s "systems" are rotten to the core. Name one that you respect and trust. This must change. DJT is an effective agent of change. That is why he is so important to our future and why the Uniparty Rats hate him. Pray...
I am thoroughly disgusted with these appointed judges! They are nothing but democrat hacks! If the media was actually doing their first amendment obligation, this would be front and center every day. I am really sick of being called part of a cult. Yes. That must have been the democrat’s email of the week!
WOW...I mean Seriously W O W! That was some article Lady Julie!
With judges like those three that Donald Trump is up against, he's lucky to have any gonads left at all. These people aren't going for the throat, they are going for the gonads, the throat, the liver, kidneys and esophagus. Not to mention, they are laying concrete in the entire rectal area!
When anybody uses the phrase "A Two Tiered Justice System" they should see a picture of Biden AND Obama's fully fledged National Democrat Judicial scaffold. And that posse of extremely willing participants in the incarcerating machine going after Donald Trump (for the rest of his bloody life) wing of each and every Demo lawyer's office building, is working overtime. But, if that cannot be accomplished forthwith, it's just not outright out of the question by these Biden/Obama Lawfare python snakes to put a full race hit for hire on him instead!
I wonder how many movies have already been depicted in this very design of if not maiming a Presidential candidate then outright put him down! I deeply fear for President Trump and I'm of the mind to believe that my fear is well founded!
Seriously, look what happened to Ashli Babbitt and she wasn't actually IN THE CROSSHAIRS of the Democrat/Leftist/Liberal/Progressive AR-15 Brigade!!
In fairness, a lot of this started with the Paula Jones prosecution. SCOTUS ruled that a President was not immune for acts committed outside his term. And we had an Independent Counsel law then. It has since expired. But the current prosecutions will significantly expand the scope of what is permitted.
It seems crazy to empower states' Attorneys General (or even county attorneys looking for a headline) to bring civil or criminal charges against a sitting President. Affirmation of the Trump charges will do just that. Given the differing and often contradictory nature of the various State statutes, Presidents from now on will spend their time in court in various state capitals.
Presidents rarely act on the basis of their own information. The Executive is filled with various experts and advisors. These individuals mostly lack authority except to advise and inform. The President gives actual orders. If the President is indictable, these advisors are as well under the rubric of conspiracy or obstruction. So no sane person will want those jobs since they'll come with significant risk and uncertainty.
The risk to all of us is that the Trump prosecutions, if successful, effectively displace the President as head of the Executive, substituting the Judiciary. Hopefully Roberts can explain that to the three and apprise them of the risk that presents when one of theirs is in the Oval. Likely he'll tell them that this will bring back States' Rights by neutering the President. A unanimous decision seems necessary here, much as the "Honest Services" state statutes have been somewhat recently circumscribed in the Bob McDonnell case.
Otherwise similar statutes, unconstitutionally vague and charged against sitting or former presidents will be the vehicle of choice for every state AG seeking a Senate or Governor's office while the President will become just a guy behind a cool desk looking over his/her shoulder all day.
If it weren't for you dogged and consistent reporting, Julie, I (and we who subscribe to your platform) wouldn't have the foggiest idea of the travesty of justice which is occurring daily inside Moscow-on-the-Potomac. Your in-depth analysis is not only informative but frightening, as well, especially the part about the involvement of F. Pan in the Carter Page debacle. I wish I could claim that I'm surprised to learn about the nuts-and-bolts of the Soviet-Show-Trials presided over by Marxists-wearing-black-robes, but, unfortunately, that wouldn't be an honest statement. At this point, all that stands between we who consider ourselves patriots are the upcoming decisions by SCOTUS, and, frankly, that scares the hell out of me. At the risk of being redundant, all that's left for us to do is pray and put this in God's hands, as it were.
Restraint and Maturity. These are two-character traits missing in the incestuous swamp of Washington DC's judicial system. Where are the Democrat statesmen or women willing to stand up for the integrity of the United States? RFK Jr. tried to, but he was quickly scuttled. It's all very discouraging.
God Bless your work, wonderful lady. God Damn those in government who do not enforce the law.
Excellent and highly informative post. Sadly, Pan and so many other judges sit where they do, exposing their partisanship and incompetence, due to the Senate’s elimination of the filibuster for judicial (and other) nominees. She was confirmed to replace now-Justice Jackson 52-42. Before Harry Reid and Senate Democrats destroyed the filibuster, that would have killed her nomination.
There are some things that the Law cannot address with clarity or the way we would like. For instance, if a foreign ambassador were to rape and kill an American citizen, he could not be prosecuted. He therefore could not be convicted. He could however, be sent back to his country of origin. Hence, a President, who uses his plenary executive power to kill his opponent faces impeachment and removal as the only remedy.
If Lincoln had assassinated Jefferson Davis would he have even been impeached?
I have said this previously. The President of the United States is treated differently than any other citizen. It has to be that way to effectively manage America in both peacetime and wartime.
It seems that everyday my cynicism regarding the corrupt nature of the federal judiciary is validated.
On the optimistic side, I just watched J6 A True Timeline yesterday, so maybe something good will come of it. I also watched Tucker interview Clay Higgins regarding J6. He calls a spade a spade, so maybe something good will come of that.
It was A Veiled Threat Julie
Thank you so much for writing this article !
One big incestuous orgy seems to best describe our D.C. court system.
The Judiciary is a branch of the Democratic Party.
It is not a difficult task to remove the most politically connected jurists from a political trial. With 12 sitting judges, and three required, it appears consideration of the circumstances requiring recusal is not often considered for either party. Perhaps my numbers are wrong.
Hi Everyone!
I wanted to share a Twitter post from this am that gives word-for-word exchange btw Judge Pan and John Sauer.
The media is lying about what he said -- SHOCKER!
Feel free to share far and wide!
https://x.com/julie_kelly2/status/1745825314809209129?s=20