An unlikely partnership of major news companies, Democrats, and Donald Trump wants the former president's March 2024 trial in Washington televised live. Merrick Garland is poised to fight them.
The whole point of January 6, which, for anyone interested in reviewing the evidence of what actually happened that day and the security precautions that were purposely not taken, was to prevent any examination of the alleged widespread fraud in the election. The risk in televising the trial is that Trump will present that evidence. The Biden Administration will do everything to prevent that from happening.
Great story Julie! Strange bedfellows indeed. If they don’t allow the cameras it will demonstrate yet again the police state in which we live. Thanks for your journalism 🙏
Most Americans believe 2020 election was stolen and that J6 was an entrapment operation. Thankfully the truth is revealed more everyday due to patriots like Julie Kelly
Julie, I have followed you from Day One! Thanks, for continuing to take a stand, you, and just a few politicians, who knew Jan6th, was another “Russian Collusion” attempt! Sadly, it worked, and people like you, continue to fight! Keep it up, we love you!
In answer to your question, when one looks at the actions of either party, they are the result of polling. I venture to guess that the Democrats have figured out that the public viewing their evil behavior in real time might not help their political future.
Since the OJ trial, prosecutors have been leery of television in the courtroom because most prosecutors have no experience with cameras except while standing at a lectern on the courthouse steps. They live in fear that a thin, complicated, boring prosecution case-in-chief will be blown out of the water by an "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit" moment they'll be unable to answer, as happened to Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden. The judge, on the other hand, won't be as easily able to exclude evidence or cut off cross examination. And failure to win a conviction in this case will see her invitations to tony Georgetown parties evaporate.
Lord knows I would love to see this trial because it would expose the two-tiered system of justice under which we live currently, Julie. Of course, that would be wonderful in the best of all possible worlds. But it's obvious that Commissar Garland isn't about to let the proletariat see what's happening in the Soviet-Show-Trials, courtesy of his Stasi-style-Secret-Police inside Moscow-on-the-Potomac, do you?
The whole point of January 6, which, for anyone interested in reviewing the evidence of what actually happened that day and the security precautions that were purposely not taken, was to prevent any examination of the alleged widespread fraud in the election. The risk in televising the trial is that Trump will present that evidence. The Biden Administration will do everything to prevent that from happening.
Great story Julie! Strange bedfellows indeed. If they don’t allow the cameras it will demonstrate yet again the police state in which we live. Thanks for your journalism 🙏
Most Americans believe 2020 election was stolen and that J6 was an entrapment operation. Thankfully the truth is revealed more everyday due to patriots like Julie Kelly
Julie, I have followed you from Day One! Thanks, for continuing to take a stand, you, and just a few politicians, who knew Jan6th, was another “Russian Collusion” attempt! Sadly, it worked, and people like you, continue to fight! Keep it up, we love you!
In answer to your question, when one looks at the actions of either party, they are the result of polling. I venture to guess that the Democrats have figured out that the public viewing their evil behavior in real time might not help their political future.
Remember all, this is the origin of the last four years(at least).
https://peterhalligan.substack.com/p/from-derailing-trumps-economic-recovery
New document filed for the Obstruction charge
https://www.supremecourt.gov/search.aspx?filename=/docket/docketfiles/html/public/23-94.html
Since the OJ trial, prosecutors have been leery of television in the courtroom because most prosecutors have no experience with cameras except while standing at a lectern on the courthouse steps. They live in fear that a thin, complicated, boring prosecution case-in-chief will be blown out of the water by an "If the glove don't fit, you must acquit" moment they'll be unable to answer, as happened to Marcia Clark and Christopher Darden. The judge, on the other hand, won't be as easily able to exclude evidence or cut off cross examination. And failure to win a conviction in this case will see her invitations to tony Georgetown parties evaporate.
Lord knows I would love to see this trial because it would expose the two-tiered system of justice under which we live currently, Julie. Of course, that would be wonderful in the best of all possible worlds. But it's obvious that Commissar Garland isn't about to let the proletariat see what's happening in the Soviet-Show-Trials, courtesy of his Stasi-style-Secret-Police inside Moscow-on-the-Potomac, do you?